good, but no "abs" function in expr~ here ! !

am i out of sync ??

cheers,

yves

David McCallum wrote:

Oh, neat! I tried doing expr~ before but used the sample-specific notation and not the vectors (I didn't/don't really understand the vector aspect of DSP.)

I wanted to use tabread4~ because I assumed that it would be less processor intensive than an expr~. Does anybody have any experience, data on this?

David McCallum

At 09:09 AM 11/05/02 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:

...

I wouldn't write this into a table but instead use the expr~ family. Unless more 'GEN' functions besides "sinesums" get implemented widely, expr~ is a better way for this kind of waveshaping. I tested some waveshaping methods in my dirty waveshaper patch available at http://footils.radio-worldwi.de (soon footils.org, btw.)

Your example is attached.

ciao,

Frank Barknecht _ _______footils__

. . David McCallum . Queen's University Electronic Music Studio Manager . and Noise Maker . html://mentalfloss.ca/sintheta/ .