Sebastien, incredible! Looking forward to see you dynamic patching thing! Wishing to help soon.

Keep rocking!

2012/3/30 sebastien piquemal sebpiq@gmail.com

Thanks ! I was kind of afraid that you were upset by me raping your code ...

I think what I did really made the whole thing easier to maintain and easier to test. The new architecture is as uncoupled as possible and so allows for more hardcore testing (for example, I wrote full unit-tests for [cos~] : https://github.com/sebpiq/**WebPd/blob/master/test/** objects.js#L60https://github.com/sebpiq/WebPd/blob/master/test/objects.js#L60 ). I'll continue refactoring in the same direction, and I expect that in ~ 1 month, I'll arrive to a point where it will be about stable. Also, I finished yesterday to implement an API for complete dynamic patching. For example, you can now do :

var patch = new Pd.Patch(); var osc440 = new Pd.objects['osc~'](patch, [440]); var dac = new Pd.objects'dac~'; patch.connect(osc440.getId(), 0, dac.getId(), 0); patch.connect(osc440.getId(), 0, dac.getId(), 1);

There's still a bunch of stuff I'm not fully satisfied of, but overall that's the idea. Also, I am moving slowly all the objects from the old system to new system (implementing full unit-testing at the same time), so many objects are not available yet, because not yet migrated.

Cheers,

Sébastien