Frank Barknecht schrieb:

Hallo, ix@replic.net hat gesagt: // ix@replic.net wrote:

...

subpatches share the 'locality' of the containing patcher, as far as $0 goes,

Also as far as $1, $2 etc. go: subpatches take $1 from the surrounding abstraction. Because of that, subpatch arguments, if they should be implemented at all, must use different symbols, like #1, #2 etc. to keep older patches from breaking.

Ciao

hi jes this is exactly what i meant..ther is no "hack"?

but i'm unfortunately not a c-programmer, and i can live in future with this behaviour of subpatches, abstractions... thanks moritz