Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers dafydd
It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I tried
Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0.
.hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers dafydd
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine whether or not that's the case.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I tried Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0.
.hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers dafydd
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works
again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a
maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine whether or not that's the case.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I tried Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0.
.hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers dafydd
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5?
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine whether
or not that's the case.cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org
wrote:It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I tried Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0.
.hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers dafydd
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hey folks
Downgrading works no problem - 0.74 is perfect.
I'm on 10.4.
Thanks for looking into this. If there's anything I can do, let me know - I'm into learning. I just need some pointers.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 6:19 PM, bsoisoi bsoisoi@mac.com wrote:
Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5?
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine whether or not that's the case.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I tried Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0.
.hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers dafydd
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi dafydd
Its true it does work great - on 10.5.1 also. Just have to be aware
that its only supporting 1 processor at the mo however. (that means
everything running at the same time as Pd)
Wish I had the know-how to get in there and help out :-/
Who was responsible for it originally does anyone know?
cheers
On 29 Jan 2008, at 01:13, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hey folks
Downgrading works no problem - 0.74 is perfect.
I'm on 10.4.
Thanks for looking into this. If there's anything I can do, let me know - I'm into learning. I just need some pointers.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 6:19 PM, bsoisoi bsoisoi@mac.com wrote:
Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5?
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers
and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine whether or not that's the case.cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I
tried Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0..hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new
version of Jack OSX (0.75)?cheers dafydd
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
You may not have the knowledge to fix Jack now, but you can learn.
Most of the Pd devs did just that in order to improve Pd. When I
started, I'd never touched Tcl and I had taken one class on C eight
years previous to that and hadn't touched since at all in the time in
between. So I basically learned C and Tcl to hack on Pd.
.hc
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Simon Mills wrote:
Hi dafydd
Its true it does work great - on 10.5.1 also. Just have to be aware that its only supporting 1 processor at the mo however. (that means everything running at the same time as Pd)
Wish I had the know-how to get in there and help out :-/
Who was responsible for it originally does anyone know?
cheers
On 29 Jan 2008, at 01:13, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hey folks
Downgrading works no problem - 0.74 is perfect.
I'm on 10.4.
Thanks for looking into this. If there's anything I can do, let me know - I'm into learning. I just need some pointers.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 6:19 PM, bsoisoi bsoisoi@mac.com wrote:
Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5?
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine
whether or not that's the case.cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I tried Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0.
.hc
On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
> Hi folks > > Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new > version of > Jack OSX (0.75)? > > cheers > dafydd > > -- > www.sideshowmedia.ca > skype: chickeninthegrass > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http:// > lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know
how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/
Okay so hook me up. (That's kinda what I wanted to hear.) I'll get the source for both. Any hints about where I might start looking?
Is the idea that I'd write a patch?
This may take _while_.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 29, 2008 9:42 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
You may not have the knowledge to fix Jack now, but you can learn. Most of the Pd devs did just that in order to improve Pd. When I started, I'd never touched Tcl and I had taken one class on C eight years previous to that and hadn't touched since at all in the time in between. So I basically learned C and Tcl to hack on Pd.
.hc
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Simon Mills wrote:
Hi dafydd
Its true it does work great - on 10.5.1 also. Just have to be aware that its only supporting 1 processor at the mo however. (that means everything running at the same time as Pd)
Wish I had the know-how to get in there and help out :-/
Who was responsible for it originally does anyone know?
cheers
On 29 Jan 2008, at 01:13, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hey folks
Downgrading works no problem - 0.74 is perfect.
I'm on 10.4.
Thanks for looking into this. If there's anything I can do, let me know - I'm into learning. I just need some pointers.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 6:19 PM, bsoisoi bsoisoi@mac.com wrote:
Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5?
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers and they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine whether or not that's the case.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote: > > It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I > tried > Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0. > > .hc > > > On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote: > >> Hi folks >> >> Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new >> version of >> Jack OSX (0.75)? >> >> cheers >> dafydd >> >> -- >> www.sideshowmedia.ca >> skype: chickeninthegrass >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http:// >> lists.puredata.info/ >> listinfo/pd-list > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > --- > ---- > > If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. > > >
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/
I'd say the first part is really clearly documenting the bug, and
trying to narrow down where the cause it. That means testing
different versions, different setups, etc.
.hc
On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Okay so hook me up. (That's kinda what I wanted to hear.) I'll get the source for both. Any hints about where I might start looking?
Is the idea that I'd write a patch?
This may take _while_.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 29, 2008 9:42 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
You may not have the knowledge to fix Jack now, but you can learn. Most of the Pd devs did just that in order to improve Pd. When I started, I'd never touched Tcl and I had taken one class on C eight years previous to that and hadn't touched since at all in the time in between. So I basically learned C and Tcl to hack on Pd.
.hc
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Simon Mills wrote:
Hi dafydd
Its true it does work great - on 10.5.1 also. Just have to be aware that its only supporting 1 processor at the mo however. (that means everything running at the same time as Pd)
Wish I had the know-how to get in there and help out :-/
Who was responsible for it originally does anyone know?
cheers
On 29 Jan 2008, at 01:13, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
Hey folks
Downgrading works no problem - 0.74 is perfect.
I'm on 10.4.
Thanks for looking into this. If there's anything I can do, let me know - I'm into learning. I just need some pointers.
cheers dafydd
On Jan 28, 2008 6:19 PM, bsoisoi bsoisoi@mac.com wrote:
Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5?
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it.
.hc
On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
> Jack OSX 0.74 works like a dream. I spoke to the Jack developers > and > they think it's a PD bug. I'm not smart enough to determine > whether > or > not that's the case. > > cheers > dafydd > > On Jan 28, 2008 12:19 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org > wrote: >> >> It doesn't work for me. Did the old version work for you? I >> tried >> Pd-extended 0.39.3, 0.40.3, and Pd-vanilla 0.41.0. >> >> .hc >> >> >> On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote: >> >>> Hi folks >>> >>> Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new >>> version of >>> Jack OSX (0.75)? >>> >>> cheers >>> dafydd >>> >>> -- >>> www.sideshowmedia.ca >>> skype: chickeninthegrass >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http:// >>> lists.puredata.info/ >>> listinfo/pd-list >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> ---- >> --- >> ---- >> >> If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the
>> problem. >> >> >> > > > > -- > www.sideshowmedia.ca > skype: chickeninthegrass
--
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
http://at.or.at/hans/-- www.sideshowmedia.ca skype: chickeninthegrass
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-
bsoisoi -
Dafydd Hughes -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Simon Mills