Hallo, Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:

I have an other approach, see gt~.pd on http://netpd.org/eni/purepd/

posted on this list a few weeks ago. please feel free to use them in anyway.

Ah, these are even better. Do you mind if I use them in such a way as putting them into the purepd folder of the subversion? ;)

Ciao

Frank

wow eni that is brilliant.

On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:

Hallo, Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:

...

Frank Barknecht wrote:

...

Ah, these are even better. Do you mind if I use them in such a
way as putting them into the purepd folder of the subversion? ;)

that would be great frank!

Okay, I added them now to trunk/abstractions/purepd

I made a little change in that I added second inlets to both gt~ and lt~ to overwrite the argument.

Additionally I added [gt2~] and [lt2~] variations at the same place which compare 2 signals. They don't accept an argument anymore however.

Are these the fake versions? Within purepd, I don't think that the
fake >~ should be named gt~/lt~ is they are not numerically accurate
copies of the real >~ <~. The idea of the purepd is that they are
exact clones of objects written in Pd. I don't think that library
should be a place for "close enough" clones, unless they are clearly
named.

.hc

Ciao

Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _
______footils.org__

---

Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list

All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne

Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

Are these the fake versions? Within purepd, I don't think that the
fake >~ should be named gt~/lt~ is they are not numerically accurate
copies of the real >~ <~. The idea of the purepd is that they are
exact clones of objects written in Pd. I don't think that library
should be a place for "close enough" clones, unless they are clearly
named.

These are Enrique's versions, which are the same as the versions in Zexy, except that Zexy's [>~] changes its second inlet from being a signal inlet to a message inlet when you provide an argument. That's not possible to do with an abstraction, so I added two versions.

Ciao

Frank