Is it possible if you have a few [pix_mix] objects that one or two of them are not working? I have a patch with four instances of the object and one of them is not working at all. It just lets the left inlet pass through. I tried them with and without arguments and it's all the same. Is there some problem with having a few instances or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
On 12/30/2012 11:26, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Is it possible if you have a few [pix_mix] objects that one or two of them are not working? I have a patch with four instances of the object and one of them is not working at all. It just lets the left inlet pass through. I tried them with and without arguments and it's all the same. Is there some problem with having a few instances or am I doing something wrong?
all pix-objects that take 2 pixes (including [pix_mix]), require that the two pixes are of the same dimension and colorspace. maybe that's the problem.
fgmadsr IOhannes
I know that, I make sure that the pixes do have the same dimentions. Otherwise I would get an error, right? Also, the left inlet receives signal (if it doesn't it [pix_mix] won't output anything, I'm aware of that too). Could anything else be the problem?
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 12/30/2012 11:26, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Is it possible if you have a few [pix_mix] objects that one or two of them are not working? I have a patch with four instances of the object and one of them is not working at all. It just lets the left inlet pass through. I tried them with and without arguments and it's all the same. Is there some problem with having a few instances or am I doing something wrong?
all pix-objects that take 2 pixes (including [pix_mix]), require that the two pixes are of the same dimension and colorspace. maybe that's the problem.
fgmadsr IOhannes
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Anyway, I replaced [pix_mix] with a couple of [spigot]s inside a subpatch and it works fine. Still, I think [pix_mix] would be more correct, so to say, since I'm using Gem..
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki@gmail.comwrote:
I know that, I make sure that the pixes do have the same dimentions. Otherwise I would get an error, right? Also, the left inlet receives signal (if it doesn't it [pix_mix] won't output anything, I'm aware of that too). Could anything else be the problem?
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.atwrote:
On 12/30/2012 11:26, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Is it possible if you have a few [pix_mix] objects that one or two of them are not working? I have a patch with four instances of the object and one of them is not working at all. It just lets the left inlet pass through. I tried them with and without arguments and it's all the same. Is there some problem with having a few instances or am I doing something wrong?
all pix-objects that take 2 pixes (including [pix_mix]), require that the two pixes are of the same dimension and colorspace. maybe that's the problem.
fgmadsr IOhannes
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Quoting Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki@gmail.com:
Anyway, I replaced [pix_mix] with a couple of [spigot]s inside a subpatch and it works fine. Still, I think [pix_mix] would be more correct, so to say, since I'm using Gem..
it's hard to say what is more correct, as we don't know you patch.
esp. we don't know what [pix_mix] is supposed to do.
if you only use [pix_mix] to switch between two different image
sources (rather than blending between 2 images), then [spigot] is
probably the better object to use anyhow (e.g. in terms of efficency),
...since you are using Pd :-)
gfmasd IOhannes
I guess you're right. Got stuck with using Gem-first objects..
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:57 PM, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki@gmail.com:
Anyway, I replaced [pix_mix] with a couple of [spigot]s inside a subpatch
and it works fine. Still, I think [pix_mix] would be more correct, so to say, since I'm using Gem..
it's hard to say what is more correct, as we don't know you patch. esp. we don't know what [pix_mix] is supposed to do. if you only use [pix_mix] to switch between two different image sources (rather than blending between 2 images), then [spigot] is probably the better object to use anyhow (e.g. in terms of efficency),
...since you are using Pd :-)
gfmasd
IOhannes
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Alexandros Drymonitis -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
zmoelnig＠iem.at