Hi Ivica,
you mean this isn't a bug? ok I see. I hope to know another object on Pd, the value pass through.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
This is the way vanilla pd sliders work, they recalculate value based on slider position. One option to avoid this problem is to use pd-l2ork where the values passed through sliders remain unchanged... On Jan 15, 2014 8:23 PM, "Jonghyun Kim" agitato816@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I think, I found a bug on slider<vsl, hsl>
When I modify the size of vslider, width and height, it comes strange.
Normally, when I input integer, output is integer. I know there is no integer in Pd but, I say as integer.
Here is strange thing
——————————
<strange>
input (integer)
|
s $0-slider
r $0-slider
|
vslider (modified height and width)
|
number box2
|
output (float)
—————————
Pd-0.45-4 (32bit) Vanilla
OS X 10.9 Mavericks
I attached Pd file
Is this bug?
Thanks,
Jong
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 01/15/2014 08:49 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Hi Ivica,
you mean this isn't a bug? ok I see. I hope to know another object on Pd, the value pass through.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Ivica Bukvic <ico@vt.edu mailto:ico@vt.edu> wrote:
This is the way vanilla pd sliders work, they recalculate value based on slider position.
Sounds like a bug to me. A bug that you fixed in Pd-l2ork.
-Jonathan
I think this was a design oversight, not really a bug as such, but anyhow I've 'fixed' it in git (will appear in 0.46). I made a compatibility mode because who knows what this might break.
cheers Miller
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:55:00PM -0500, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On 01/15/2014 08:49 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Hi Ivica,
you mean this isn't a bug? ok I see. I hope to know another object on Pd, the value pass through.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Ivica Bukvic <ico@vt.edu mailto:ico@vt.edu> wrote:
This is the way vanilla pd sliders work, they recalculate value based on slider position.
Sounds like a bug to me. A bug that you fixed in Pd-l2ork.
-Jonathan
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Thanks a lot!! I'll try 0.46. It's very nice feature for me:)
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
I think this was a design oversight, not really a bug as such, but anyhow I've 'fixed' it in git (will appear in 0.46). I made a compatibility mode because who knows what this might break.
cheers Miller
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:55:00PM -0500, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On 01/15/2014 08:49 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Hi Ivica,
you mean this isn't a bug? ok I see. I hope to know another object on
Pd,
the value pass through.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Ivica Bukvic <ico@vt.edu mailto:ico@vt.edu> wrote:
This is the way vanilla pd sliders work, they recalculate value based on slider position.
Sounds like a bug to me. A bug that you fixed in Pd-l2ork.
-Jonathan
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Jonathan Wilkes -
Jonghyun Kim -
Miller Puckette