I'm grinding my teeth trying to work out an audio signal version of [mod]. I have a [phasor~]-driven looping abstraction with a variable loop point, but sometimes the parameters I send it cause it to go past the end of the table, resulting in silence when I'd rather it started playing immediately from the start of the table again.
Is there some way to get the audio signal number to wrap back around to 0 (i.e the start of the table) after it passes a given value (i.e. the end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
best, d.
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the length of the loop is longer than what's left of the sample in the table, currently I get silence. If I use [wrap~] the way you describe it, the loop I select always starts at the beginning of the table, because [wrap~] returns the percentage of the table I have "overshot".
I need a solution where, if the table is 100 places long, I can loop from 95 back around to 25 if need be. Which is what my theoretical [mod~] would do. But I simply can't "wrap" my head around how to construct it. Your [wrap~] solution seems to return a loop starting at 0 which is 30 units long instead.
best, d.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
i am sure it does. try scaling the signal before sending it to [wrap~] and afterwards undo the scaling.
[/~ 100] | [wrap~] | [*~ 100]
mfa.sdr IOhannes
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which doesn't work yet!
d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the length of the loop is longer than what's left of the sample in the table, currently I get silence. If I use [wrap~] the way you describe it, the loop I select always starts at the beginning of the table, because [wrap~] returns the percentage of the table I have "overshot".
I need a solution where, if the table is 100 places long, I can loop from 95 back around to 25 if need be. Which is what my theoretical [mod~] would do. But I simply can't "wrap" my head around how to construct it. Your [wrap~] solution seems to return a loop starting at 0 which is 30 units long instead.
best, d.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
i am sure it does. try scaling the signal before sending it to [wrap~] and afterwards undo the scaling.
[/~ 100] | [wrap~] | [*~ 100]
mfa.sdr IOhannes
Sorry, last patch was missing the tabread!!!!!
Use this one!
d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which doesn't work yet!
d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the length of the loop is longer than what's left of the sample in the table, currently I get silence. If I use [wrap~] the way you describe it, the loop I select always starts at the beginning of the table, because [wrap~] returns the percentage of the table I have "overshot".
I need a solution where, if the table is 100 places long, I can loop from 95 back around to 25 if need be. Which is what my theoretical [mod~] would do. But I simply can't "wrap" my head around how to construct it. Your [wrap~] solution seems to return a loop starting at 0 which is 30 units long instead.
best, d.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
i am sure it does. try scaling the signal before sending it to [wrap~] and afterwards undo the scaling.
[/~ 100] | [wrap~] | [*~ 100]
mfa.sdr IOhannes
#N canvas 315 27 885 778 10; #X text 240 13 0 - 127; #X text 574 6 0 - 255; #X text 581 45 127 = normal; #X text 580 31 255 = lowest; #X text 584 61 0 = highest; #X obj 91 516 phasor~; #X obj 91 553 *~; #X obj 91 302 / 44.1; #X obj 91 329 expr 1 / ($f1 * 1 / 1000); #X obj 61 247 t f f; #X obj 91 422 sig~; #X obj 91 450 *~; #X text 142 302 time in ms (use 48 if sample rate is 48KHz); #X text 103 245 number of samples in glitch; #X obj 268 116 hsl 128 15 0 127 0 0 empty empty empty -2 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X text 241 39 127 = whole sample; #X text 244 60 0 = smallest fraction; #X obj 251 146 / 127; #X obj 61 219 *; #X obj 91 583 +~; #X obj 452 124 hsl 128 15 0 255 0 0 empty empty empty -2 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X floatatom 458 193 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 385 234 *; #X obj 581 229 / 127; #X obj 622 134 hsl 128 15 0 255 0 0 empty empty empty -2 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X floatatom 595 272 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 598 196 abs; #X obj 599 172 - 255; #X obj 250 175 t b f; #X obj 400 188 t b f; #X floatatom 324 163 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X text 416 14 0 - 127; #X obj 434 153 / 255; #N canvas 0 22 406 310 wraparound~ 0; #X obj 87 29 inlet~; #X obj 87 149 outlet~; #X obj 87 83 wrap~; #X obj 87 55 /~; #X obj 87 113 *~; #X obj 144 28 inlet total num of samples in table; #X connect 0 0 3 0; #X connect 2 0 4 0; #X connect 3 0 2 0; #X connect 4 0 1 0; #X connect 5 0 3 1; #X connect 5 0 4 1; #X restore 91 631 pd wraparound~; #X obj 551 383 table test_zample; #X obj 29 21 openpanel; #X obj 30 -8 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 0 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1; #X msg 29 49 read -resize $1 test_zample; #X obj 28 76 soundfiler; #X obj 240 85 inlet loop length; #X obj 393 86 inlet loop offset; #X obj 552 85 inlet loop pitch; #X text 419 33 127 = table start; #X text 420 60 0 = table end; #X obj 91 682 dac~; #X text 121 585 offset loop from start of table; #X text 126 555 multiply phasor~ by loop length; #X text 277 329 convert ms to frequency in Hz; #X text 209 630 <------this needs help!!!!!! without this subpatch , loop offset works , but can go beyond bounds of table. with this subpatch , loop offset does not work , so table bounds cannot be reached.; #X connect 5 0 6 0; #X connect 6 0 19 0; #X connect 7 0 8 0; #X connect 8 0 10 0; #X connect 9 0 6 1; #X connect 9 0 33 1; #X connect 9 1 7 0; #X connect 10 0 11 0; #X connect 11 0 5 0; #X connect 14 0 17 0; #X connect 14 0 30 0; #X connect 17 0 28 0; #X connect 18 0 9 0; #X connect 19 0 33 0; #X connect 20 0 32 0; #X connect 22 0 19 1; #X connect 23 0 25 0; #X connect 23 0 11 1; #X connect 24 0 27 0; #X connect 26 0 23 0; #X connect 27 0 26 0; #X connect 28 0 18 0; #X connect 28 1 18 1; #X connect 29 0 22 0; #X connect 29 1 22 1; #X connect 32 0 21 0; #X connect 32 0 29 0; #X connect 33 0 44 0; #X connect 33 0 44 1; #X connect 35 0 37 0; #X connect 36 0 35 0; #X connect 37 0 38 0; #X connect 38 0 18 0; #X connect 38 0 22 0; #X connect 39 0 17 0; #X connect 40 0 32 0; #X connect 41 0 27 0;
Hallo, Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which doesn't work yet!
I added a [tabread4~ test_zample] and now it works. ;)
Now seriously: The forgotten tabread probably wasn't the error you were looking for. But here the patch now works as advertised: Setting loop offset to nearly the end of the sample will indeed wrap around to the start of the sample and play from there just fine.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Hallo, Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which doesn't work yet!
I added a [tabread4~ test_zample] and now it works. ;)
Now seriously: The forgotten tabread probably wasn't the error you were looking for. But here the patch now works as advertised: Setting loop offset to nearly the end of the sample will indeed wrap around to the start of the sample and play from there just fine.
Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to 25, und so weiter.
best, d.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later.
Sorry! Should read:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to 25, und so weiter.
apologies, d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to 25, und so weiter.
best, d.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later.
Hi there,
I am not so terribly into that right now..
Just an idea.
What if you just shift the table and write it to a second one...
silly probably...
just an idea
Am 07.05.2007 um 20:25 schrieb Derek Holzer:
Sorry! Should read:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through
0 to 25, und so weiter.apologies, d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through
0 to 25, und so weiter.best, d.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later.
-- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 175: "What are the sections sections of? Imagine a caterpillar moving"
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
Derek Holzer wrote:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to 25, und so weiter.
Like this?
Note: 0 -> [wrap~] -> 1, which is weird (and undesirable in my eyes).
Claude
http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org
#N canvas 0 0 387 615 10; #X obj 45 170 phasor~; #X obj 45 283 wrap~; #X obj 46 203 *~ 30; #X obj 45 230 +~ 95; #X obj 45 257 /~ 100; #X obj 45 312 *~ 100; #X floatatom 163 235 5 0 0 1 table-length - -; #X floatatom 164 201 5 0 0 1 offset - -; #X floatatom 165 174 5 0 0 1 loop-length - -; #X obj 45 396 tabread4~ $0-table 100; #X floatatom 167 145 5 0 0 1 frequency - -; #X obj 45 425 tabsend~ $0-scope; #N canvas 0 0 450 300 (subpatch) 0; #X array $0-scope 64 float 0; #X coords 0 1 63 -1 64 64 1; #X restore 99 467 graph; #N canvas 0 0 450 300 (subpatch) 0; #X array $0-table 100 float 0; #X coords 0 1 99 -1 100 64 1; #X restore 99 327 graph; #X obj 46 66 samplerate~; #X msg 103 89 0; #X obj 47 42 t b b; #X obj 46 22 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144 -1 -1; #X obj 45 90 / 64; #X msg 166 123 set $1; #X connect 0 0 2 0; #X connect 1 0 5 0; #X connect 2 0 3 0; #X connect 3 0 4 0; #X connect 4 0 1 0; #X connect 5 0 9 0; #X connect 6 0 4 1; #X connect 6 0 5 1; #X connect 7 0 3 1; #X connect 8 0 2 1; #X connect 9 0 11 0; #X connect 10 0 0 0; #X connect 14 0 18 0; #X connect 15 0 0 1; #X connect 16 0 14 0; #X connect 16 1 15 0; #X connect 17 0 16 0; #X connect 18 0 0 0; #X connect 18 0 19 0; #X connect 19 0 10 0;
On 07/05/2007, at 20.51, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Note: 0 -> [wrap~] -> 1, which is weird (and undesirable in my eyes).
Yeah. I still can't translate "wrap~ gives the difference between the
input and the largest integer not exceeding it" to that. The quote is
from the help file.
Oops.. that's a bug.
To work around it for now, add 1 (or a higher integer), then wrap...
cheers Miller On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 09:40:53PM +0200, Steffen wrote:
On 07/05/2007, at 20.51, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Note: 0 -> [wrap~] -> 1, which is weird (and undesirable in my eyes).
Yeah. I still can't translate "wrap~ gives the difference between the
input and the largest integer not exceeding it" to that. The quote is
from the help file.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Does anyone have a way to read freiOr plugins into pd/pdp/pidip/GEM
I would love to have something similar to the pdp_freeframe external to enhance the visuals
Sevvy?
Cheers
Pat
Hi Frank,
thanks for helping. This is the solution I tried at first. However, with this every loop starts at the beginning of the table, no matter where I set the loop offset. I'm assuming you actually tested it before posting, so are there different versions of [wrap~] perhaps?
d.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which doesn't work yet!
I added a [tabread4~ test_zample] and now it works. ;)
Now seriously: The forgotten tabread probably wasn't the error you were looking for. But here the patch now works as advertised: Setting loop offset to nearly the end of the sample will indeed wrap around to the start of the sample and play from there just fine.
Ciao
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
hi derek
i attached a patch, that should do what you want. it is a modified version of IOhannes approach, but it is still only a [wrap~] with scaling functionality.
roman
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 19:00 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote:
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the length of the loop is longer than what's left of the sample in the table, currently I get silence. If I use [wrap~] the way you describe it, the loop I select always starts at the beginning of the table, because [wrap~] returns the percentage of the table I have "overshot".
I need a solution where, if the table is 100 places long, I can loop from 95 back around to 25 if need be. Which is what my theoretical [mod~] would do. But I simply can't "wrap" my head around how to construct it. Your [wrap~] solution seems to return a loop starting at 0 which is 30 units long instead.
best, d.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
i am sure it does. try scaling the signal before sending it to [wrap~] and afterwards undo the scaling.
[/~ 100] | [wrap~] | [*~ 100]
mfa.sdr IOhannes
Hi Roman,
and thanks. I implemented it in my patch, but it doesn't seem to work right. The looping isn't seamless, in fact there's a "hiccup" at the point where the loop wraps around. In my previous version, I had another function to calculate the offset and start point, so what would work better for me is the the original concept, of an audio [mod~] which would only wrap around the end point of the table.
Try for yourself and see with the attached patch.
d.
Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi derek
i attached a patch, that should do what you want. it is a modified version of IOhannes approach, but it is still only a [wrap~] with scaling functionality.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Roman,
and thanks. I implemented it in my patch, but it doesn't seem to work right. The looping isn't seamless, in fact there's a "hiccup" at the point where the loop wraps around. In my previous version, I had another function to calculate the offset and start point, so what would work better for me is the the original concept, of an audio [mod~] which would only wrap around the end point of the table.
like this?
mfg.asdr IOhannes
#N canvas 509 102 698 619 10; #X obj 338 88 table sample; #X obj 47 95 soundfiler; #X floatatom 47 112 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X text 158 116 lenght in samples; #X obj 46 387 dac~; #X obj 46 357 tabread4~ sample; #X msg 14 91 bang; #N canvas 578 50 639 478 tabreader 0; #X obj 142 451 outlet~; #X obj 93 40 inlet looplength[samples]; #X obj 142 295 *~ 44100; #X obj 141 130 t f b; #X obj 166 148 samplerate~; #X obj 141 163 /; #X obj 141 98 t f f; #X msg 141 183 1 $1; #X obj 141 259 phasor~ 1; #X obj 141 200 /; #X obj 143 369 /~ 44100; #X obj 143 406 *~ 44100; #X obj 143 387 wrap~; #X obj 186 352 t f f; #X obj 142 278 *~ 1; #X obj 237 189 t b f; #X obj 143 312 +~ 0; #X obj 93 59 route filelength length offset speed bang; #X msg 285 82 0; #X obj 141 236 * 1; #X connect 1 0 17 0; #X connect 2 0 16 0; #X connect 3 0 5 0; #X connect 3 1 4 0; #X connect 4 0 5 1; #X connect 5 0 7 0; #X connect 6 0 3 0; #X connect 6 1 2 1; #X connect 7 0 9 0; #X connect 8 0 14 0; #X connect 9 0 19 0; #X connect 10 0 12 0; #X connect 11 0 0 0; #X connect 12 0 11 0; #X connect 13 0 10 1; #X connect 13 1 11 1; #X connect 14 0 2 0; #X connect 15 0 19 0; #X connect 15 1 19 1; #X connect 16 0 10 0; #X connect 17 0 13 0; #X connect 17 1 6 0; #X connect 17 2 16 1; #X connect 17 3 15 0; #X connect 17 4 18 0; #X connect 18 0 8 1; #X connect 19 0 8 0; #X restore 47 339 pd tabreader; #X msg 152 327 speed $1; #X floatatom 156 303 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X msg 258 236 offset $1; #X floatatom 343 263 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X msg 263 191 length 62079; #X msg 66 253 bang; #X floatatom 343 295 0 0 0 0 - - -; #X msg 47 78 read -resize $1 sample; #X msg 54 29 bang; #X symbolatom 96 27 10 0 0 0 - - -; #X msg 256 210 length 220500; #X msg 393 277 bang; #X obj 46 60 symbol zexy.wav; #X obj 182 36 openpanel; #X obj 181 9 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144 -1 -1; #X text 100 254 restart loop; #X obj 343 278 * 44100; #X text 348 212 loop length; #X text 328 239 loop offset; #X msg 47 145 filelength $1 , offset 0 , length $1; #X connect 1 0 2 0; #X connect 2 0 27 0; #X connect 5 0 4 0; #X connect 5 0 4 1; #X connect 6 0 2 0; #X connect 7 0 5 0; #X connect 8 0 7 0; #X connect 9 0 8 0; #X connect 10 0 7 0; #X connect 11 0 24 0; #X connect 12 0 7 0; #X connect 13 0 7 0; #X connect 14 0 10 0; #X connect 15 0 1 0; #X connect 16 0 20 0; #X connect 17 0 20 0; #X connect 18 0 7 0; #X connect 19 0 14 0; #X connect 20 0 15 0; #X connect 21 0 20 0; #X connect 22 0 21 0; #X connect 24 0 14 0; #X connect 27 0 7 0;
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Roman,
and thanks. I implemented it in my patch, but it doesn't seem to work right. The looping isn't seamless, in fact there's a "hiccup" at the point where the loop wraps around. In my previous version, I had another function to calculate the offset and start point, so what would work better for me is the the original concept, of an audio [mod~] which would only wrap around the end point of the table.
like this?
or to put it in your own words: try and find the difference...
mfga.sdr IOhannes
#N canvas 334 83 885 778 10; #X text 240 13 0 - 127; #X text 574 6 0 - 255; #X text 581 45 127 = normal; #X text 580 31 255 = lowest; #X text 584 61 0 = highest; #X obj 91 516 phasor~; #X obj 91 553 *~; #X obj 91 302 / 44.1; #X obj 91 329 expr 1 / ($f1 * 1 / 1000); #X obj 61 247 t f f; #X obj 91 422 sig~; #X obj 91 450 *~; #X text 142 302 time in ms (use 48 if sample rate is 48KHz); #X obj 268 116 hsl 128 15 0 127 0 0 empty empty empty -2 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X text 241 39 127 = whole sample; #X text 244 60 0 = smallest fraction; #X obj 251 146 / 127; #X obj 61 219 *; #X obj 91 583 +~; #X obj 452 124 hsl 128 15 0 255 0 0 empty empty empty -2 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X floatatom 458 193 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 385 234 *; #X obj 581 229 / 127; #X obj 622 134 hsl 128 15 0 255 0 0 empty empty empty -2 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1 0 1; #X floatatom 595 272 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 598 196 abs; #X obj 599 172 - 255; #X obj 250 175 t b f; #X obj 400 188 t b f; #X floatatom 324 163 5 0 0 0 - - -; #X obj 434 153 / 255; #N canvas 0 22 406 310 wraparound~ 0; #X obj 87 29 inlet~; #X obj 87 149 outlet~; #X obj 87 83 wrap~; #X obj 87 55 /~; #X obj 87 113 *~; #X obj 144 28 inlet total num of samples in table; #X connect 0 0 3 0; #X connect 2 0 4 0; #X connect 3 0 2 0; #X connect 4 0 1 0; #X connect 5 0 3 1; #X connect 5 0 4 1; #X restore 91 631 pd wraparound~; #X obj 551 383 table test_zample; #X obj 29 21 openpanel; #X obj 30 -8 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 0 -6 0 8 -262144 -1 -1; #X msg 29 49 read -resize $1 test_zample; #X obj 28 76 soundfiler; #X obj 240 85 inlet loop length; #X obj 393 86 inlet loop offset; #X obj 552 85 inlet loop pitch; #X text 420 60 0 = table end; #X obj 91 712 dac~; #X text 121 585 offset loop from start of table; #X text 126 555 multiply phasor~ by loop length; #X text 277 329 convert ms to frequency in Hz; #X text 209 630 <------this needs help!!!!!! without this subpatch , loop offset works , but can go beyond bounds of table. with this subpatch , loop offset does not work , so table bounds cannot be reached.; #X text 103 245 number of samples in loop; #X text 416 16 0 - 255; #X text 419 32 255 = table start; #X obj 91 688 tabread4~ test_zample; #X connect 5 0 6 0; #X connect 6 0 18 0; #X connect 7 0 8 0; #X connect 8 0 10 0; #X connect 9 0 6 1; #X connect 9 1 7 0; #X connect 10 0 11 0; #X connect 11 0 5 0; #X connect 13 0 16 0; #X connect 13 0 29 0; #X connect 16 0 27 0; #X connect 17 0 9 0; #X connect 18 0 31 0; #X connect 19 0 30 0; #X connect 21 0 18 1; #X connect 22 0 24 0; #X connect 22 0 11 1; #X connect 23 0 26 0; #X connect 25 0 22 0; #X connect 26 0 25 0; #X connect 27 0 17 0; #X connect 27 1 17 1; #X connect 28 0 21 0; #X connect 28 1 21 1; #X connect 30 0 20 0; #X connect 30 0 28 0; #X connect 31 0 49 0; #X connect 33 0 35 0; #X connect 34 0 33 0; #X connect 35 0 36 0; #X connect 36 0 17 0; #X connect 36 0 21 0; #X connect 36 0 31 1; #X connect 37 0 16 0; #X connect 38 0 30 0; #X connect 39 0 26 0; #X connect 49 0 41 0;
HI IOhannes,
thanks, yes, I found the difference! I think I was trying to wrap around the length of the loop instead of the length of the table (for some reason or another...). The patch you sent does exactly what I set out to do, and essentially is only different in this way. So it wasn't [wrap~], but how I was using it.
danke! d.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
or to put it in your own words: try and find the difference...
-
Claude Heiland-Allen -
Derek Holzer -
Frank Barknecht -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Luigi Rensinghoff -
Miller Puckette -
Pagano, Patrick -
Roman Haefeli -
Steffen