hi,
FYI: just a short description of an observation:
same two movies in same patch played use about 2*20 to 2*25 % cpu when i decode using pdp_qt~ compared to 11+6 % when i use pdp_yqt
movies have no audio track so this does not play a role (hopefully)
i will just use yqt from now - yet somehow it confused me a bit
martin
martin pi
http://attacksyour.net/pi
www.machfeld.net
hi martin,
FYI: just a short description of an observation:
same two movies in same patch played use about 2*20 to 2*25 % cpu when i decode using pdp_qt~ compared to 11+6 % when i use pdp_yqt
movies have no audio track so this does not play a role (hopefully)
i will just use yqt from now - yet somehow it confused me a bit
me too.. since it is almost the same code, and most of the time should be spent inside the lqt_decode_video call.. strange strange.
can you find out which colourmodel (and codec) is used? the colormodel is reported as pdp_qt/qt~: using colormodel x
you can find out which codec is used by playing the movie with lqtplay.
tom
hi,
just to clear up some points about pdp_qt/pdp_yqt :
pdp_yqt is an early version of tom's pdp_qt that i have tweaked to add the audio support, all the video decoding stuff was taken form pdp_qt ( i think from version 0.3 ).
cheers,
sevy/yves
Tom Schouten wrote:
hi martin,
FYI: just a short description of an observation:
same two movies in same patch played use about 2*20 to 2*25 % cpu when i decode using pdp_qt~ compared to 11+6 % when i use pdp_yqt
movies have no audio track so this does not play a role (hopefully)
i will just use yqt from now - yet somehow it confused me a bit
me too.. since it is almost the same code, and most of the time should be spent inside the lqt_decode_video call.. strange strange.
can you find out which colourmodel (and codec) is used? the colormodel is reported as pdp_qt/qt~: using colormodel x
you can find out which codec is used by playing the movie with lqtplay.
tom
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list