Hello,
I believe I found a bug with the objects [cartopol~] and [poltocar~]. Basically, if I would connect both outlets of [cartopol~] to the inlets of [poltocar~], I would expect to receive the same values as I would input. The problem is that the output of the second outlet of [poltocar~] is multiplied by -1! I tested this with both Pd 0.46.5 and pd-extended 0.43.4 (and this bug isn't present in Pd-l2Ork).
Here is an image of the problem: http://s1.postimg.org/bs79w4d5b/Screenshot_from_2015_10_16_22_50_23.png
Is this a known bug?
Cheers, Gilberto
Just a little update: the problem is with [cartopol~], its rightmost outlet is outputting the correct value multiplied by -1.
On 16/10/15 22:55, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hello,
I believe I found a bug with the objects [cartopol~] and [poltocar~]. Basically, if I would connect both outlets of [cartopol~] to the inlets of [poltocar~], I would expect to receive the same values as I would input. The problem is that the output of the second outlet of [poltocar~] is multiplied by -1! I tested this with both Pd 0.46.5 and pd-extended 0.43.4 (and this bug isn't present in Pd-l2Ork).
Here is an image of the problem: http://s1.postimg.org/bs79w4d5b/Screenshot_from_2015_10_16_22_50_23.png
Is this a known bug?
Cheers, Gilberto
this has been corrected in the new cyclone library
actually, both cartopol~ and poltocar~ were "wrong" in the same way, but for extended 0.42 only poltocar~ was corrected, this incomplete fix ended up ruining spectral processing that was actually working before that.
get the new cyclone, many objects are being corrected
cheers
2015-10-16 18:14 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Agostinho via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at>:
Just a little update: the problem is with [cartopol~], its rightmost outlet is outputting the correct value multiplied by -1.
On 16/10/15 22:55, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hello,
I believe I found a bug with the objects [cartopol~] and [poltocar~]. Basically, if I would connect both outlets of [cartopol~] to the inlets of [poltocar~], I would expect to receive the same values as I would input. The problem is that the output of the second outlet of [poltocar~] is multiplied by -1! I tested this with both Pd 0.46.5 and pd-extended 0.43.4 (and this bug isn't present in Pd-l2Ork).
Here is an image of the problem: http://s1.postimg.org/bs79w4d5b/Screenshot_from_2015_10_16_22_50_23.png
Is this a known bug?
Cheers, Gilberto
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I am sure this has been covered on this list before--if it is not too much of a trouble where can one get the new version of cyclone?
Also, there are some improvements on pd-l2ork side of things that I've implemented that may detract from Max behavior but also offers other benefits. For instance, coll object can be threaded and as such allows loading of large files without dropping samples, albeit at the expense of determinacy, so one in these cases must rely on outputting done loading bang signal before working with the cool object. This option is fully backwards compatible and the default behavior is non-threaded. It would be great if we could have those merged so that we don't have to maintain two separate versions of the cyclone library.
Best,
cool = coll
Hi Ivica, you can get the new cyclone with deken and also here https://puredata.info/downloads/cyclone/releases/0.1-alpha57
I'm sure you can contribute to it and update it. I'm notr maintaining it myself, but I've been extensively reporting bugs to it. Fred is working on it, but this is a library that needs more maintaining and maintainers.
I'm considering learning how to code externals and practice it just so I can help with it.
cheers
2015-10-17 0:48 GMT-03:00 Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu:
cool = coll
-- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Associate Professor Computer Music ICAT Senior Fellow Director -- DISIS, L2Ork Virginia Tech School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 ico@vt.edu www.performingarts.vt.edu disis.icat.vt.edu l2ork.icat.vt.edu Ico.bukvic.net On Oct 16, 2015 11:48 PM, "Ivica Bukvic" ico@vt.edu wrote:
I am sure this has been covered on this list before--if it is not too much of a trouble where can one get the new version of cyclone?
Also, there are some improvements on pd-l2ork side of things that I've implemented that may detract from Max behavior but also offers other benefits. For instance, coll object can be threaded and as such allows loading of large files without dropping samples, albeit at the expense of determinacy, so one in these cases must rely on outputting done loading bang signal before working with the cool object. This option is fully backwards compatible and the default behavior is non-threaded. It would be great if we could have those merged so that we don't have to maintain two separate versions of the cyclone library.
Best,
-- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Associate Professor Computer Music ICAT Senior Fellow Director -- DISIS, L2Ork Virginia Tech School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 ico@vt.edu www.performingarts.vt.edu disis.icat.vt.edu l2ork.icat.vt.edu Ico.bukvic.net this has been corrected in the new cyclone library
actually, both cartopol~ and poltocar~ were "wrong" in the same way, but for extended 0.42 only poltocar~ was corrected, this incomplete fix ended up ruining spectral processing that was actually working before that.
get the new cyclone, many objects are being corrected
cheers
2015-10-16 18:14 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Agostinho via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at>:
Just a little update: the problem is with [cartopol~], its rightmost outlet is outputting the correct value multiplied by -1.
On 16/10/15 22:55, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hello,
I believe I found a bug with the objects [cartopol~] and [poltocar~]. Basically, if I would connect both outlets of [cartopol~] to the inlets of [poltocar~], I would expect to receive the same values as I would input. The problem is that the output of the second outlet of [poltocar~] is multiplied by -1! I tested this with both Pd 0.46.5 and pd-extended 0.43.4 (and this bug isn't present in Pd-l2Ork).
Here is an image of the problem: http://s1.postimg.org/bs79w4d5b/Screenshot_from_2015_10_16_22_50_23.png
Is this a known bug?
Cheers, Gilberto
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list