Hi
I'm trying to have vu show something useful, but with partial success. I have this:
| [snapshot~] | [posetive] | [rmstodb] | [- 100] | [s $to_vu]
[posetive] is a simple abstraction that... makes negative values posetive (1->1, -1->1, 0->0, etc).
This kinda works, but at lower levels, and esp with only high frequency content the meter falls all the way to the bottom. What would make a better meter?
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to have vu show something useful, but with partial success. I have this:
| [snapshot~] | [posetive] |
[env~]
[rmstodb] | [- 100] | [s $to_vu]
[posetive] is a simple abstraction that... makes negative values posetive (1->1, -1->1, 0->0, etc).
This kinda works, but at lower levels, and esp with only high frequency content the meter falls all the way to the bottom. What would make a better meter?
Did you try [prvu~]?
D.
Atte André Jensen wrote:
I'm trying to have vu show something useful, but with partial success.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Did you try [prvu~]?
Now I did.
I decided to go with a simple env~ solution for now.
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to have vu show something useful, but with partial success. I have this:
| [snapshot~] | [posetive] | [rmstodb] | [- 100] | [s $to_vu]
[posetive] is a simple abstraction that... makes negative values posetive (1->1, -1->1, 0->0, etc).
you mean like the absolute value? like [abs]?
This kinda works, but at lower levels, and esp with only high frequency content the meter falls all the way to the bottom. What would make a better meter?
hmm, a single sample is not really representative for the signal, is it? imagine you have a signal: 0 0.33 0.66 1 0 0.33 0.66 1 ..... which will have "0" each and every sample that is dividable by 4 without a remainder; since you bang the [snapshot~] only at block-boundaries, your vu will always display 0 (-inf) if the signal is offset by -1 sample, your vu will always display 1 (unity gain; full-scale)
so i don't fully understand your why you don't want to use [env~]?
[env~] | [- 100] | [vu]
fgadmrt IOhannes
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
so i don't fully understand your why you don't want to use [env~]?
Because I'm a newbie, that never used [env~] before?
[env~] | [- 100] | [vu]
That works better, thanks!