Hi, I did, in fact I'm using sigmund~ cause somewhere in this list, someone (Miller?) said it was better to use it instead of fiddle~. Can anybody confirm that sigmund~ is better? I have a patch that relies on realtime pitch and partials extraction, and I'd like to compare different objects but I have only found sigmund~. Sigmund~ reports peaks by analyzing the FFT of a window, I'd like to compare other methods (stft?, wavelets?, ...?)
Any other ideas?
Thanks!
Julian Villegas
Me pregunto de un modo pensativo Que significa ser Colombiano? No se le respondi. Es un acto de fe JLB.
----- Original Message ---- From: hard off hard.off@gmail.com To: Julian Villegas julovi@yahoo.com Cc: Isidro Gonzalez isidro_gonsoy@yahoo.com; pd-list@iem.at Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 8:17:10 PM Subject: Re: [PD] frequency components analysis
you looked at [fiddle~] right?
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 02:00 -0700, Julian Villegas wrote:
I did, in fact I'm using sigmund~ cause somewhere in this list, someone (Miller?) said it was better to use it instead of fiddle~. Can anybody confirm that sigmund~ is better?
What do you mean 'better'? What is it you are trying to do?
I have a patch that relies on realtime pitch and partials extraction, and I'd like to compare different objects but I have only found sigmund~. Sigmund~ reports peaks by analyzing the FFT of a window, I'd like to compare other methods (stft?, wavelets?, ...?)
Any other ideas?
You might want to take a look at the xtract_peak_spectrum() function provided in LibXtract.
http://www.postlude.co.uk/Software/Libxtract
There are Pd bindings provided, and an example of how to use [xtract~ peak_spectrum] is shown in the help file: [f0] -> [pd guts] -> [pd pda].
Jamie
-
Jamie Bullock -
Julian Villegas