Hi,
I am still battling with the RME - it runs and seems happy for a while, but it is getting gnarly after a while with PD... I tried the -rt flag, no joy (and no sound!). could it be conflicting with Gem at any point? Only a simple Gem thing and a simple sample recording and playback...shouldn't be too much.
I have the possibility to switch over to a M-Audio delta 1010 LT card, which is apparently ALSA supported. Any recommendations? Yes, No, not with PD, ...?
Cheers from Maribor,
tim
I have the possibility to switch over to a M-Audio delta 1010 LT card, which is apparently ALSA supported. Any recommendations? Yes, No, not with PD, ...?
hi,
i'm very happy with my m-audio delta 1010 lt. working fine with pd, alsa, jack, 2.6. i would like to try someday the RME.
patrick
Howdy,
patrick wrote:
I have the possibility to switch over to a M-Audio delta 1010 LT card, which is apparently ALSA supported. Any recommendations? Yes, No, not with PD, ...?
i'm very happy with my m-audio delta 1010 lt. working fine with pd, alsa, jack, 2.6. i would like to try someday the RME.
OTOH, I'm very happy with my HDSP. For me the trick was using Jack. I've found the interface of PD + ALSA to be tempremental at best no matter what soundcard. And I use Ardour and other Jack apps anyway, so in the end it's no big deal to have Jack running. But it's your call really. The HDSP is legendary for the headaches it causes, but also legendary for its performance once you get it properly configured.
best, d.
patrick wrote:
I have the possibility to switch over to a M-Audio delta 1010 LT card, which is apparently ALSA supported. Any recommendations? Yes, No, not with PD, ...?
i'm very happy with my m-audio delta 1010 lt. working fine with pd, alsa, jack, 2.6. i would like to try someday the RME.
OTOH, I'm very happy with my HDSP. For me the trick was using Jack.
exactly the same for me
best, -j
Ti Bo wrote:
Hi,
I am still battling with the RME - it runs and seems happy for a while, but it is getting gnarly after a while with PD... I tried the -rt flag, no joy (and no sound!). could it be conflicting with Gem at any point? Only a simple Gem thing and a simple sample recording and playback...shouldn't be too much
if you want to "pd -rt -lib Gem" with nvidia's drivers and a 2.6-kernel (not sure about 2.4; even less about 2.2) make sure to have a kernel>=2.6.10 if you don't want to experience hard crashes.
mfg.das.r IOhannes
I am not getting crashes, but I am getting nasty digital glitching. Running a 2.4 kernel (the 2.6 kernels do not want to deal with the SATA drive for some reason) and ATI drivers for Gem. But it seems to be keeping itself within boundaries - adding some switch~es and reducing the number of samples in the environment is helping: some compromise will be reached at some point...
thanks for help and comments!
tm
On Apr 22, 2005, at 11:13 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Ti Bo wrote:
Hi,
I am still battling with the RME - it runs and seems happy for a while, but it is getting gnarly after a while with PD... I tried the -rt flag, no joy (and no sound!). could it be conflicting with Gem at any point? Only a simple Gem thing and a simple sample recording and playback...shouldn't be too much
if you want to "pd -rt -lib Gem" with nvidia's drivers and a 2.6-kernel (not sure about 2.4; even less about 2.2) make sure to have a kernel>=2.6.10 if you don't want to experience hard crashes.
mfg.das.r IOhannes
----- Tim Boykett TIME'S UP::Research Department \ / Industriezeile 33b A-4020 Linz Austria X +43-732-787804(ph) +43-732-7878043(fx) / \ tim@timesup.org http://www.timesup.org
-
derek holzer -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
julien.breval＠tremplin-utc.net -
patrick -
Ti Bo