At the back of my mind, a thought that there must be a vanilla way of doing this. "I'm sure I saw it somewhere..." etc Just as with the [text] objects, I'm gradually emerging from years of using Pd-extended 0.42/43 and realising the power of vanilla.Thanks Roman Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 16:15, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> wrote:
You know about [array get] and [array set], do you?
Roman
On Fre, 2017-04-21 at 15:02 +0000, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly morph_2016@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source! _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists. iem.at> wrote:
I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small
- the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My
rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk%C2%A0 _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis tinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis tinfo/pd-list