do I interpret it correct if I assume that a solution for [tabread~]-ing big files without quality loss would be to make a counter and split one big [line~] movement into small segments ?
something like:
[metro 100] | [f]X[+ 4410] | [s adder]
and
[r adder] | [t b f] | | [0, 4410 100( | | / [line~] / | ______ / [+~] | [tabread~]
? gr, Tim
2010/11/29 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/2010 08:40 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
Thank you Roman, this is exactly the kind of concise and clear information I was looking for to include in the chapters on sample playback in the Pd FLOSS Manual!
But that is relevant to [tabread~] and [tabread], NOT [tabread4~], which
furthermore, if you only need to play back without transposing, you might also want to consider [tabplay~] (depending on your problem of course), which does not has this problem at all.
fgart IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzzak8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQiSwCfdb+dAzFq4rSAET5bP3C3aBoU iM8AniFQx104laXpsXIhra5NbUXXc/vU =XH3S -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list