do I interpret it correct if I assume that a solution for [tabread~]-ing big files without quality loss would be to make a counter and split one big [line~] movement into small segments ?

something like:

[metro 100]
|
[f]X[+ 4410]
|
[s adder]

and

[r adder]
|
[t  b                f]
|                     |
[0, 4410 100(   |
|                    /
[line~]          /
|     ______ /  
[+~] 
|
[tabread~]

?
gr,
Tim

2010/11/29 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/28/2010 08:40 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
>
>> Thank you Roman, this is exactly the kind of concise and clear
>> information I was looking for to include in the chapters on sample
>> playback in the Pd FLOSS Manual!
>
> But that is relevant to [tabread~] and [tabread], NOT [tabread4~], which

furthermore, if you only need to play back without transposing, you
might also want to consider [tabplay~] (depending on your problem of
course), which does not has this problem at all.

fgart
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkzzak8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQiSwCfdb+dAzFq4rSAET5bP3C3aBoU
iM8AniFQx104laXpsXIhra5NbUXXc/vU
=XH3S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list