on the subject of oscillator banks, someone said that this method where you use oversampling and incrementingthe phase of a specific sample in the block can be more efficient than just using separate oscillators (inspired by a characterization from one of miller's lectures):https://forum.puredata.info/topic/13327/additive-sine-synth-thinghaven%27t tested efficiency myself
-seb
-----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com To: Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com; pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2022 8:52 am Subject: Re: [PD] is [sigmund~] a "phase vocoder"?
haha :) Sure, I know her, but it's just an oscillator bank and it's awesome! The technical question still remains whether it can be called a 'phase vocoder' cheers Em seg., 12 de dez. de 2022 às 13:43, Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com escreveu:
- Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com [2022-12-12 17:23]:
Hi, just get things straight and confirmed, for quite a while now I have included [sigmund~] into a "phase vocoder" section of my tutorial.
I never check and I'm just guessing it uses what is called "phase vocoder analysis" to find accurate pitches and that can be used in a bank of oscillators and I see that a so called "phase vocoder" is also used for reconstructing signals with an oscillator bank.
Who could confirm or deny this? :)
Perhaps his wife can help you here? http://deken.puredata.info/library/martha~
best, P
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list