on the subject of oscillator banks, someone said that this method where you use oversampling and incrementing
the phase of a specific sample in the block can be more efficient than just using separate oscillators
(inspired by a characterization from one of miller's lectures):
https://forum.puredata.info/topic/13327/additive-sine-synth-thing
haven't tested efficiency myself
-seb
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>
To: Peter P. <peterparker@fastmail.com>; pd-list@lists.iem.at
Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2022 8:52 am
Subject: Re: [PD] is [sigmund~] a "phase vocoder"?
haha :)
Sure, I know her, but it's just an oscillator bank and it's awesome! The technical question still remains whether it can be called a 'phase vocoder'
cheers
* Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> [2022-12-12 17:23]:
> Hi, just get things straight and confirmed, for quite a while now I have
> included [sigmund~] into a "phase vocoder" section of my tutorial.
>
> I never check and I'm just guessing it uses what is called "phase vocoder
> analysis" to find accurate pitches and that can be used in a bank of
> oscillators and I see that a so called "phase vocoder" is also used for
> reconstructing signals with an oscillator bank.
>
> Who could confirm or deny this? :)
Perhaps his wife can help you here?
http://deken.puredata.info/library/martha~
best, P
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list