On 27/01/2008, at 2.58, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for vline~? Are there any practical uses for it?
Otherwise, I don't see why it wouldn't be better to just accept a
list like [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( where it starts at 0, goes to 1 in 1000 seconds, then goes to .5 in 1000 seconds, then goes to 0 in 2000 seconds. Why even have the extra digit?i cannot follow you here at all.
Kyle wants to, correct me if i'm wrong, translate
[0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000 1000, 0 2000 2000( | [vline~]
into
[0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( | [nothirdVline~]
That is have the object do the delay bookkeeping.
Or maybe this would to instead:
[0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( | [vlineBookkeeper] | [vline~]