Em sáb., 18 de jan. de 2020 às 12:49, oliver oliver@klingt.org escreveu:
João Pais wrote:
Hello list,
I didn't try clone yet, I always worked with dynamic patching for similar issues. For those who are knowledgeable, I would like to ask: is there any advantage of clone against dynamic patching when using the same circuit, or is it the same? This pertains to patches working on both control and signal input/output.
if you are familiar with MAX:
[clone] is nearly the same as [poly~]
one feature badly missing is the possibility ta allocate dynamic "voice" (or "instance") numbers (i.e. how many instances of an abstraction are created). i hope miller has plans to implement this in the future.
right now, all you can do is a combination of using [clone] and dynamic
patching if you want to change the number of instances on the fly (destroy the old clone object and re-create it with new arguments with PD messages).
Yeah, that's a nice feature to have, why don't you open a request on github? https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues