Em sáb., 18 de jan. de 2020 às 12:49, oliver <oliver@klingt.org> escreveu:
João Pais wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I didn't try clone yet, I always worked with dynamic patching for
> similar issues. For those who are knowledgeable, I would like to ask: is
> there any advantage of clone against dynamic patching when using the
> same circuit, or is it the same?
> This pertains to patches working on both control and signal input/output.
>

if you are familiar with MAX:

[clone] is nearly the same as [poly~]

one feature badly missing is the possibility ta allocate dynamic "voice"
(or "instance") numbers (i.e. how many instances of an abstraction are
created). i hope miller has plans to implement this in the future. 
right now, all you can do is a combination of using [clone] and dynamic
patching if you want to change the number of instances on the fly
(destroy the old clone object and re-create it with new arguments with
PD messages).

Yeah, that's a nice feature to have, why don't you open a request on github? https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues