So, the question then is what is broken and what is the source of the problem... On Feb 5, 2013 8:40 PM, "Hans-Christoph Steiner" hans@at.or.at wrote:
Yup, that's the one.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 07:04 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
During build process, pd-l2ork gets it from:
git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem
Isn't this the most up-to-date version?
On 02/05/2013 04:59 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is
out of
date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its
the
last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working.
Can
you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list