On 03/10/2014 12:56 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 03/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Additionally, IOhannes also knows that Miller wants the [initbang] functionality in the form of a backwards-compatible [loadbang] which takes arguments. [...]
thanks for the insights. i didn't know that i knew *that*. i would therefore be interested how i could have known it.
Sorry, I assumed you read the relevant publicly available thread that has messages you authored weaving through it: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.devel/8611
That's from 2010. For a patch you submitted in 2006.
We're currently in 2014.
That such a feature would take nearly a decade to get into the professed "core" (and still isn't included, in any form) is a symptom of an unhealthy development process. An unhealthy development process keeps potential developers from participating and improving the software, which is a vicious cycle.
-Jonathan
vcmr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list