On 03/10/2014 12:56 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 03/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:

Additionally, IOhannes also knows that Miller wants the [initbang] functionality in the form of a backwards-compatible [loadbang] which takes arguments.
[...]

thanks for the insights.
i didn't know that i knew *that*. i would therefore be interested how i
could have known it.

Sorry, I assumed you read the relevant publicly available thread that has messages you authored weaving through it:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.devel/8611

That's from 2010.  For a patch you submitted in 2006.

We're currently in 2014.

That such a feature would take nearly a decade to get into the professed "core" (and still isn't included, in any form) is a symptom of an unhealthy development process.  An unhealthy development process keeps potential developers from participating and improving the software, which is a vicious cycle.

-Jonathan


vcmr
IOhannes




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list