I thought [send13] and [receive13] from the ext13 library were for settable send and receive? Or am I misunderstanding the question?
I've used those 2 objects a lot and thought they seemed pretty stable...
-John
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.comwrote:
Does anyone have a demo crasher, with iem_receive, [r~], or of any of the iemguis (which of course have settable receives as well)?
It's not immediately apparent how to change a receive symbol while a message is "currently passing through the receive object". I though Pd was supposed to be deterministic.
-Jonathan
----- Original Message -----
From: Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at; "pd-list@iem.at" <
pd-list@iem.at>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:42 AM Subject: Re: [PD] variable receive objects?
Hi all -
If you make a settable 'receive' and then change the setting in a context in which a message is currently passing through the receive object (not at all an unlikely thing to have happen) it will crash Pd. There are
ways
around this but I don't know of any that would not slow down the global functioning of Pd itself.
cheers Miller
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 07:07:28AM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 4:03 AM Subject: Re: [PD] variable receive objects?
On 05/12/2012 07:58 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Marian Wegermail@marianweger.com To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:09 AM Subject: Re: [PD] variable receive objects?
hi!
> is there a way to generate a variable receive object
similar to a
send via
message box, whose source is defined at load time?
use iem_receive / iem_r from iemlib.
Wow, that is classic Pd development style-- add a tiny feature to
an
object, but don't actually improve _that_ object.
ever thought that there might be a good reason why [r] is not
seettable,
and that [iem_r] - while superficially working - exposes exactly the problems of a settable [r]?
Enlighten me.
mfgadsr IOhannes
PS: there should be a discussion on this topic in the archives.
I don't find anything of the sort. Tried searching for "settable
receive", "setting receive",
and "iem_receive"
-Jonathan
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list