UML can be an italian dish as well...
http://www.lattix.com/files/images/technology/antuml.jpg
I used to work with modelling source from UML (old days) and it was worse than my spaghetti in pd.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Lorenzo Sutton lorenzofsutton@gmail.comwrote:
On 23/02/12 04:24, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
If that may reassure you... not only Pd has messes of uncooked spaghetti going under boxes and stuff. And not only dataflow diagrams have them. This is an example in a data-relational diagram in a database app :
http://www.altova.com/images/**landing_page/mapforce_** screenshot_large.pnghttp://www.altova.com/images/landing_page/mapforce_screenshot_large.png
And at least in Pd you can subpatch.. Graphs can get pretty tricky too, especially when created automatically:
http://perro.si/wp-content/**uploads/2008/08/bb.gifhttp://perro.si/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/bb.gif
And cooking the spaghetti softens the spaghetti but it's still spaghetti.
Ugh, softened spaghetti are terrible - they are the buffer overflow of pasta cooking!!
OTOH, it would be a lot more readable already if the middle boxes were just placed in proper places...
True... Maybe also a vertical flow instead of horizontal.
______________________________**______________________________** __________ | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list