UML can be an italian dish as well...

http://www.lattix.com/files/images/technology/antuml.jpg


I used to work with modelling source from UML (old days) and it was worse than my spaghetti in pd. 

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsutton@gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/02/12 04:24, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

If that may reassure you... not only Pd has messes of uncooked spaghetti going under boxes and stuff. And not only dataflow diagrams have them. This is an example in a data-relational diagram in a database app :

http://www.altova.com/images/landing_page/mapforce_screenshot_large.png

And at least in Pd you can subpatch.. Graphs can get pretty tricky too, especially when created automatically:

http://perro.si/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/bb.gif



And cooking the spaghetti softens the spaghetti but it's still spaghetti.

Ugh,  softened spaghetti are terrible -  they are the buffer overflow of pasta cooking!!



OTOH, it would be a lot more readable already if the middle boxes were just placed in proper places...

True... Maybe also a vertical flow instead of horizontal.



 ______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



--
Pedro Lopes (HCI Researcher / MSc)
contact: pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/pedro.lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch