27 May
2014
27 May
'14
11:06 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2014-05-27 01:03, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On 05/26/2014 04:28 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2014-05-26 09:35, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
void *tabPowSine_new(t_symbol *s, short argc, t_atom *argv)
short argc? why short?
this *must* be int (32bit!).
I see no good reason to use short here, either.
But I have to admit I am now curious-- what problem would it cause in this specific case? The number of args to the object will certainly be
i was trying to explain that in my other longish mail with all those hexnumbers.
fgamsdr IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJThHHAAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4q4MP/RRyg2wxneGqqVW21XvXQsHv
Vze9kROvakNbDNkWusmP7mVa/nbayBpcXMb3+AugDUF8a84sQ/DLbgDFpsblB7wL
rF5dZOzTR4VYdPgbSWQPDG7ZLKxg+IHUl8X9KbAE3cm8TSMyKAgI+UWoOe7egOPU
ZalcvxMPSaGz/V0dIMb16TtlRnysTz6VR/SIW/V9SkxtF8DJe0c/zt3eqdCmKf2J
E0aR0iy/pqibsdDuGYoNERVkO8gbOhIdw0XVlKybb8M2Wzj6WurYRSjZTV/yCtUW
0HRm4QGaGoVKoLRWKn0lRVD4S8lR2NdXnJNC64XciLm+8ZQ7sF6ekSw6PiduywGL
HG+SfbEX/OkyYGnuMyi3y54l0BYkILYPgk11E34plcAO+3fW4P6JHdgHu4cCGxxm
sSVHwyYb8qYmGf9zg2P+0OL/RHK6RRsGLSglsNjiPzsabGFJ7XcVIoUvsRmUiwWk
XfqGh7w2ufFGGGZJlSBtZh+noQqd4qyowN6IEMJicQI8h4JusOdUE2hZB9aGCdhZ
FGZcqeYZyoKeU+Q0D6kMcuhMTjeOf5TKpgLaCWvenWMYqDfljNIRUyfMjRSEKhNk
b6jQo5quOnI87af/m9M2z2g/wSk5q0Vjv5GJ4qUiVZrxwL9P8pgjl89AtiDp54dq
OelTfQgpHzz92XeOWFlg
=sR1o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----