yes i agree also put the file on-line and off-line b
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Derek Holzer derek@umatic.nl wrote:
Yes agreed, I like having a "local copy" of the archive for those special times when the internet is far away. And the idea of having to manually rename every attachment isn't very cool either!!!!!! I see lots of complaints on the horizon for that. Imagine having a complicated patch with several abstractions that must be sorted and properly named in order for it to work.
D.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
but then i really think it is not such a bad idea to enable this feature.
any other opinions?
Hm, would this mean that we would not get any attachements sent anymore, just links? That I wouldn't really like, as it make my personal list-archive depend on pd.info, which is not available everywhere I go.
Ciao
-- ::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ::: http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista ::: ---Oblique Strategy # 99: "Is there something missing?"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list