Ah, that's much simpler than what I was thinking. How do you always do it Roman? :D
On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:44 AM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
From: Roman Haefeli reduzent@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] routeOSC - dynamic routing? Date: August 7, 2013 7:16:13 AM EDT To: pd-list@iem.at
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 02:15 -0400, puredata@11h11.com wrote:
hi all,
i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to avoid
having to cut and paste & click and drag. what are my options here?[routeOSC /knob1 /knob2 ...] | | [s $0-knob1] [s $0-knob2]
thanks
Instead of routing with [routeOSC], you could use the last address field directly as the send address:
[/knobs/knob1 23( | [routeOSC /knobs/ | [list] | [; $1 $2(
As an alternative to the ;-messagebox with hard-coded number of elements, you could employ a settable [send]
Roman
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com