Ah, that's much simpler than what I was thinking. How do you always do it Roman? :D

On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:44 AM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:

From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PD] routeOSC - dynamic routing?
Date: August 7, 2013 7:16:13 AM EDT
To: pd-list@iem.at


On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 02:15 -0400, puredata@11h11.com wrote:
hi all,

i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to avoid  
having to cut and paste & click and drag. what are my options here?

[routeOSC /knob1 /knob2 ...]
|              |
[s $0-knob1]   [s $0-knob2]

thanks

Instead of routing with [routeOSC], you could use the last address field
directly as the send address:

[/knobs/knob1 23(
|
[routeOSC /knobs/
|
[list]
|
[; $1 $2(

As an alternative to the ;-messagebox with hard-coded number of
elements, you could employ a settable [send]

Roman

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika