18 Jan
2014
18 Jan
'14
7:27 p.m.
Touché :-)
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:15 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 01/18/2014 06:59 PM, Pall Thayer wrote:
Ah... I've seen this in some of the help patches. Why would someone do it with multiple [+~] instead of a single [*~]? There's no difference?
aesthetic reasons? hinting at bigger structures?
but consider this: why would someone write the following code?
#!/usr/bin/perl sleep((8*60)*60);
it does the same as the following (which is slightly faster):
#!/usr/bin/perl sleep(28800);
gfamdsr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
*****************************
Pall Thayer
artist
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
*****************************