On 01/18/2014 06:59 PM, Pall Thayer wrote:
> Ah... I've seen this in some of the help patches. Why would someone do it
> with multiple [+~] instead of a single [*~]? There's no difference?

aesthetic reasons?
hinting at bigger structures?

but consider this: why would someone write the following code?
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> sleep((8*60)*60);

it does the same as the following (which is slightly faster):
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> sleep(28800);


gfamdsr
IOhannes


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list