Em ter., 20 de fev. de 2024 às 14:32, cyrille henry ch@chnry.net escreveu:
Le 20/02/2024 à 17:10, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
Em sáb., 17 de fev. de 2024 às 07:01, cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net
mailto:ch@chnry.net> escreveu:
if you put 1 mass and 1 spring, you have a 1st order filter.hmm, ok
or maybe a 2nd order, since it can resonate. sorry, I'm not good at filters.
No worries, by the way, I really liked that [tong~] abstraction that used [cpole~] to create a damped harmonic oscillation, I'm using that for "spring like" signals and writing an external for it. Also by the way, [vcf~] is based on [cpole~] so it is quite similar, but [vcf~] has a gain compensation so the maximum gain is at 0dB.
I know a little bit about filters and will try to investigate more. I've been avoiding physical modelling for ages and it seems its finally time to dig in :)
cheers
cheers c
if you put two 1st order filter one after the other, you have one2nd order filter.
So this means that the information that you can have a 2nd order filter
like Ringz from SC is not really "the same" as Spring, the comparison is very crude, so it seems, and I thought so...
scann synth was propose when a 100 masses simulation need too muchCPU to be computed in real time at audio rate. So the shape of the string was only computed at data rate.
if you use audio object, then it's not scanned synthesis. it's justPM audio simulation.
So, your just mixing multiple things here, and I hardly understandthis discussion.
hmmm, yeah, I guess they are not "properly" implementing it in SC, just
finding a way to do it with their resources that comes as close as it is possible...
Well, I'm not sure if it's worth porting SC's Spring into ELSE, they are
not being able to say what it is useful for in their forum... but I ported the bouncing ball and it seems something way more fun to play with.
Thanks