2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt thecryoflove@gmail.com
The problem is I've already written my patch for a delay line =)
I also read that tables have some latency when using them in loopers (what I am doing) because they can only write in block size. I was about to switch to using tables and then I read this...
Hi Tyler, I don't know what you want to do specifically, but I guess you could use a subpatch with a small blocksize if that matters. This is for example useful when making something like a flanger effect, or karplus strong synthesis, because delread~ can not go below 1x the blocksize...(if I remember correctly) I still don't see anything in this you can only do with delay lines and not with tables, though I might miss the point :) gr, Tim
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:38 AM, tim vets timvets@gmail.com wrote:
2010/10/17 Peter Plessas plessas@mur.at
tim vets wrote:
2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt thecryoflove@gmail.com
http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg00287.html
I googled my question and came up with this thread... considering it was 4 years old I figured maybe someone out there had a fresh solution...
I need to clear a delay that I have written via delwrite~. Is there any way to do this yet?
Yes, let me chime into this topic! I also come accross situations where I need to clear a delay buffer, and I was looking for a message like "; const 0" which can be use to clear tables. And, yes, it needs to be a delay, not a table.
so what is it you can do with a delay that you can't with tabread~, tabwrite~ and a table? gr, Tim
Looking forward to suggestions!
tabwrite~ ?
Tim
Tyler
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list