2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt
<thecryoflove@gmail.com>
The problem is I've already written my patch for a delay line =)
I also read that tables have some latency when using them in loopers (what I am doing) because they can only write in block size. I was about to switch to using tables and then I read this...
Hi Tyler,
I don't know what you want to do specifically, but I guess you could use a subpatch with a small blocksize if that matters.
This is for example useful when making something like a flanger effect, or karplus strong synthesis, because delread~ can not go below 1x the blocksize...(if I remember correctly)
I still don't see anything in this you can only do with delay lines and not with tables, though I might miss the point :)
gr,
Tim
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:38 AM, tim vets
<timvets@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/10/17 Peter Plessas
<plessas@mur.at>
Yes, let me chime into this topic! I also come accross situations where I need to clear a delay buffer, and I was looking for a message like
"; const 0"
which can be use to clear tables. And, yes, it needs to be a delay, not a table.
so what is it you can do with a delay that you can't with tabread~, tabwrite~ and a table?
gr,
Tim
Looking forward to suggestions!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list