Thanks.
alex
On Mercredi, août 31, 2005, at 12:39 pm, Miller Puckette wrote:
It's
cosinesum 64 0 1 0 -0.333 0 0.2 0 -0.1428 0 0.1111 0 -0.09090
or
sinesum 64 1 0 0.333 0 0.2 0 0.1428 0 0.1111 0 0.09090
See chapter 10 of: http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques.htm
cheers Miller
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:06:55AM -0400, alexandre matheson wrote:
I have been using sinesum to create square waveforms in arrays to be read by [tabosc4~] but I am not sure about the amplitude of the partials. I have been reducing the amplitude by half and the waveform doesn't look square enough to me. Am I doing this properly?
[bang( | [f $0] | [; / [$1-osc sinesum 64 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 0.125 0 0.0625 0 0.03125; | [$1-osc normalize 1 \
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list