I don't think anyone actually said that sampling was a technological parody. There are lots of things you can do with samples and loops that you wouldn't be able to do with whatever was being sampled.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear Miller, B07.sampler.pd is a technological parody. Thanks, Jonathan
Please tell me whether that means that a) Miller should remove that tutorial, b) he should revise it to be better, c) it's a waste of time for Miller to read it at all, c) something else.
If you didn't choose a or b, then please explain how all of you can possibly be in agreement about any kind of judgment, aesthetic or otherwise, or even understand the relevance of each other's responses, merely by referring to the performance as a "technological parody".
-Jonathan
--- On *Wed, 6/22/11, Olivier Baudu lamouraupeuple@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Olivier Baudu lamouraupeuple@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" hans@at.or.at Cc: pd-list@iem.at, "Marco Donnarumma" devel@thesaddj.com Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 6:59 PM
Hi list,
Whether or not you like his music is a separate question, I think its very hard to refute that he has musical skill and talent with his instrument. And that is very rare with new interfaces for musical expression.
.hc
I totally agree with you but only since he's explained how works his instrument... It's pity that, on the video, the performance seems to show someone who's triggering some pre-recorded patterns... In that case, I was quite agree with the "technological parody" expression... :-p
But it's not... and, clearly, Onyx has to be congratulated.
Bravo.
01ivier.
-- Envie de tisser ? http://yamatierea.org/papatchs/
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Pd-list@iem.at http://mc/compose?to=Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list