Dear Miller,
B07.sampler.pd is a technological parody.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Please tell me whether that means that a) Miller should remove that tutorial,
b) he should revise it to be better, c) it's a waste of time for Miller to read it at all,
c) something else.
If you didn't choose a or b, then please explain how all of you can possibly be in
agreement about any kind of judgment, aesthetic or otherwise, or even
understand the relevance of each other's responses, merely by referring to the
performance as a "technological parody".
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Olivier Baudu <lamouraupeuple@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Olivier Baudu <lamouraupeuple@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd
performance at TED
To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" <hans@at.or.at>
Cc: pd-list@iem.at, "Marco Donnarumma" <devel@thesaddj.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 6:59 PMHi list,
Whether or not you like his music is a separate question, I think its
very hard to refute that he has musical skill and talent with his
instrument. And that is very rare with new interfaces for musical
expression.
.hc
I totally agree with you but only since he's explained how works his instrument... It's pity that, on the video, the performance seems to show someone who's triggering some pre-recorded patterns...
In that case, I was quite agree with the "technological parody" expression... :-p But it's not... and, clearly, Onyx has to be congratulated. Bravo. 01ivier. -- Envie de tisser ?
http://yamatierea.org/papatchs/
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|