Thanks, Miller.
Yes, it seems that is the case. I attach an example that shows the delayed block(s).
What do you mean inefficient? I do not see a drastic change in cpu usage on the very basic adc-to-dac example subprocess I include here.
As a side note, I noticed that loading -fifo 0 seems to crash pd !
Best,
ffdd
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
That _should_ be correct.
fifos less than 2 are probably inefficient (but I dn't know that for sure).
cheers Miller
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:37:42PM -0300, Fede Camara Halac wrote:
???Hi,
When using pd~ with -fifo 1, do you get a delay of 1 block like in
throw/catch scenario?
Thanks!
fd
fdch.github.io
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!...