Thanks, Miller.

Yes, it seems that is the case. I attach an example that shows the delayed block(s).

What do you mean inefficient? I do not see a drastic change in cpu usage on the very basic adc-to-dac example subprocess I include here.

As a side note, I noticed that loading -fifo 0 seems to crash pd !

Best,

ffdd

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:

That _should_ be correct.

fifos less than 2 are probably inefficient (but I dn't know that for
sure).

cheers
Miller

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:37:42PM -0300, Fede Camara Halac wrote:
> ???Hi,
>
> When using pd~ with -fifo 1, do you get a delay of 1 block like in throw/catch scenario?
>
> Thanks!
>
> fd
>
> fdch.github.io
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!!Mih3wA!Uyv-HqXmCoj0l9209QG7_r5nfJVd8i8hyj0jSDRm6FzZv6t-9DKLtwT6Zaba$