Pd-list May 2016

pd-list@lists.iem.at

78 participants
146 discussions

number box bug?
by Simon Iten 08 May '16

08 May '16

is it intentional that alt-click resets to zero even if lower bounds are not zero? i think that at least for positive lower values it would be more intuitive if the number box would go to that value… cheers

2 1

more help file suggestions for pd 0.47
by Alexandre Torres Porres 08 May '16

08 May '16

So i did browse though all the help files again to see if I could find anything else, here it is: [%], [mod] and [div] call the otherbinops-help file, but none of these 3 objects are mentioned in it, so please update this help file to include them. both delwrite~ and delread~ could be update to refer to the new vd~ name delread4~ (I had suggested this before with delread~ but forgot about delwrite~). [value] could be update to inform that you can both read and write values to it from the [expr] family of objects Moreover, many help files were hurting the eye because comments were overlaping with objects, the window size was wring and things like that. I assume some font size and things like that changed from one version to another and things got a little screwed up (30 of them exactly). I made changes myself, all very minute and just to correct this aesthetic and reading problems - some incredibly minute, while other needed more effort separating overlapping things. But anyway, none should configure an "update to 0.47" remark in my oppinion... cause it's all the same! only thing I really changed was in [change] (haha) - where I fixed a typo (STREAM instead of STEAM), find them all attached. cheers

4 6

Re: [PD] Can you close source of Pd patches (for commercial development)?
by Dan Wilcox 07 May '16

07 May '16

There is one already: https://github.com/patricksebastien/libpd4unity <https://github.com/patricksebastien/libpd4unity> -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > On May 7, 2016, at 1:49 PM, pd-list-request(a)lists.iem.at wrote: > > From: "Pagano, Patrick" <pat(a)digitalworlds.ufl.edu <mailto:pat@digitalworlds.ufl.edu>> > Subject: Re: [PD] Can you close source of Pd patches (for commercial development)? > Date: May 7, 2016 at 1:49:51 PM MDT > To: Matti Viljamaa <mviljamaa(a)kapsi.fi <mailto:mviljamaa@kapsi.fi>> > Cc: "pd-list(a)iem.at <mailto:pd-list@iem.at>" <pd-list(a)iem.at <mailto:pd-list@iem.at>>, Miller Puckette <msp(a)ucsd.edu <mailto:msp@ucsd.edu>>, "pd-list(a)mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@mail.iem.at>" <pd-list(a)mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@mail.iem.at>> > > > Want to make some dough off of pd? > > Make a Pd Unity3D plugin so i can drop my patches in as sound sources/effects in Unity3D or UDK without custom coding. >

1 0

Re: [PD] Can you close source of Pd patches (for commercial development)?
by Pagano, Patrick 07 May '16

07 May '16

I urge you to look at Max then. Pd is plenty attractive as it is now. I have never bought or sold a Pd "patch" and never plan on it either. Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A Interactive Media & Education +1352.226.2016 https://patrickrpagano.wordpress.com/ On May 7, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Matti Viljamaa <mviljamaa(a)kapsi.fi<mailto:mviljamaa@kapsi.fi>> wrote: I think if Pd was viable for many different users, it would be more attractive. Commercial software is sometimes better quality than open source / free. Which can lend to better tools being developed for the platform since there's a commercial incentive. Wonder e.g. why the Max platform is more popular, even if its commercial. Commerciality isn't stopping people from using it. -Matti On 07 May 2016, at 19:08, Pagano, Patrick <pat(a)digitalworlds.ufl.edu<mailto:pat@digitalworlds.ufl.edu>> wrote: So like you'd use like years and years and years of open source development for like your own personal gain? Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A Interactive Media & Education +1352.226.2016 https://patrickrpagano.wordpress.com/ On May 7, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Matti Viljamaa <mviljamaa(a)kapsi.fi<mailto:mviljamaa@kapsi.fi>> wrote: I've been thinking about the feasibility of leveraging Pd as a development platform for commercial patches. Sort of like some (e.g. Twisted Tools) are using Reaktor for developing commercial-grade plug-ins. But instead of Reaktor I could rather use Pd, because it's a more open platform. But if the development is for commercial purposes, there would need to be some sort of mechanism for closing the source. Is this possible or something worth looking at? -Matti _______________________________________________ Pd-list(a)lists.iem.at<mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

1 0

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0test2 released
by rolfm＠dds.nl 07 May '16

07 May '16

this my pd file : #N struct 1011-symarray float x array symbols 1011-sym; #N struct 1011-sym symbol name float on; #N canvas 235 0 1120 645 10; #X declare -path ./abs-pd; #X obj 37 113 fred-links; i open it with Vanilla (latest test version), add a [i], and save. this is the saved file: #N struct 1010-symarray float x array symbols 1010-sym; #N struct 1010-sym symbol name float on; #N canvas 235 50 1120 645 10; #X obj 37 113 fred-links; #X obj 149 59 i; the declare statement has disappeared this doesn't happen with vanilla 46.7 rolf

2 2

Re: [PD] [netsend] bug?
by Mario Mey 06 May '16

06 May '16

Ok, thanks for clarify! I get what I was looking for. When I make the patch "nice, clean and tidy", I'll post on stackoverflow, where I posted a question. Thanks everybody! El 06/05/16 a las 15:08, IOhannes m zmölnig escribió: > On 05/06/2016 02:45 PM, Mario Mey wrote: >> The connection is well done, but I discovered that the messages arrives >> with a ";" at the end of the message. > this is the format that Pd messages are transmitted in. > it is not a bug, but called FUDI > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUDI > > both applications (e.g. Pd and VLC) need to speak the same protocol in > order to communicate. to make [netsend] not speak FUDI but any arbitrary > protocol, use the 'raw' mode (as jack has pointed out) > > gfmdsar > IOhannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list(a)lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

1 0

[ot] threat of pure data
by Peter Nyboer 06 May '16

06 May '16

Sometimes I wish pd had a more search-engine friendly name (could be worse, like “max” or something!), but then such gems like this turn up "And some music executives openly worry that discounting their expertise for pure data would threaten their jobs and result in “a horrible, soulless, robotic society,” as one put it a conference in Norway last month." — http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/07/business/media/the-sweet-streaming-sound-… The moral is: keep using pure data to save society. -Nyboer

2 1

New version of sigpack available via deken
by Fred Jan Kraan 06 May '16

06 May '16

Hi All, I just completed the upload of an updated version of sigpack to puredata.info, and it is available via deken. I contacted Martin Weiß and he is ok with this release, but please send the bug-reports to me. Apart from the restyled help-patches, I fixed some issues. Summary release notes 0.044: - Changed version to 0.044, - decimate~: fixed gitch at block start, - freqshift~: fixed off-by-one loop causing NaNs. (Partially) updated from upstream, - round~: fixed division by zero issue, - transient~: optimized/updated, - vowel~: moved static array to instance struct to allow multiple instances and prevent NaNs, - *-help.pd: reformatted and improved. The github repository is at https://github.com/electrickery/pd-sigpack. Greetings, Fred Jan

1 0

[PD-announce] pd 0.47-0test2 released
by rolfm＠dds.nl 05 May '16

05 May '16

i try to migrate my patch from PD-ext 43.4 naar Vanilla 47.4test in one of the abstractions i do my [declare]'s. opening the patch works alright (except of course the missing externals). when i change something in the main patch,save it and open it again the [declare]'s are 'not seen' any more and the abstractions not loaded. with vanilla 46.7 this doesn't happen. rolf

2 1

Warning currently unsupported 176, and also 160.
by ray Y 05 May '16

05 May '16

On 2016-05-04 03:10, ray Y wrote: >> im geting this errors: >> Warning currently unsupported 176, and also 160. >> it is slowing down communication. >> how can i fix this? > > by first telling us what you are doing. > >fgasdmr >IOhannes > simple serial communication using comport with an arduino. baud rate 115200. the errors come in an unpredictable fashion. thanks, r.y

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list May 2016