Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> Since the mrpeach objects don't include both network and OSC stuff in
> the same object, perhaps replacement objects could be created using
> his routines, a simple mash-up of the peach udpsend/receive and his
> packOSC routines. Perhaps it could even be done as an abstraction.
>
> Would there be any point doing that?
They are simplified now so that all you need to do is something like:
[/test/one 1 2 3(
|
[packOSC]
|
[udpsend]
and
[udpreceive 9999]
|
[unpackOSC]
|
[routeOSC /test]
so it wouldn't be hard to make abstractions.
Martin