Hej.......
At 10:39 15-10-2006, Frank Barknect wrote:
>Hallo,
>Steffen Leve Poulsen hat gesagt: // Steffen Leve Poulsen wrote:
>
> > At 19:21 14-10-2006, you wrote:
> > >That's a creative exploitation of the pd file format, but too
> > >dangerous for my taste. You risk destroying your whole patch.
> >
> > OK tak I understand that.
> > I need at least a 5MB pd-file.
> > what is best?
>
>Hm, now I don't understand what you mean. ;(
Maybe it's BS
...but I like the workflow of hardware music machines, so I'm trying
to impose the same limits when using PD.
>Personally I prefer saving into a file outside of the patch so I can
>reuse the same patch for different "scores".
Thats exactly what I mean, a workflow like Csound's instrument/score approach.
> A thing in the middle
>would be Pd's data structures, which an be exported to a file but also
>saved inside the patch.
I'll look into that
Steffen