Pd-list March 2004

pd-list@lists.iem.at

158 participants
381 discussions

Gem load problem
by thewade 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

Is this a gem problem or a glut problem? I thought glut was optional. /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/Gem.pd_linux: /usr/local/lib/libglut.so.3: undefined symbol: XmuLookupStandardColormap Gem: can\'t load library I have two libglut.so.3 on my machine. Is there a way to force which one is used? [wade@transport wade]$ ls -l /usr/lib/libglut.so.3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mar 15 11:30 /usr/lib/libglut.so.3 -> libglut.so.3.8.0 [wade@transport wade]$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/libglut.so.3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Mar 4 09:26 /usr/local/lib/libglut.so.3 -> libglut.so.3.7 Thanks, -thewade

4 3

Re: [PD] Still with the Gem!
by thewade 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

the zmoelnig says : > hi. > > so you finally made Gem work ? great not really. I got it to load by forcing it not compile with gltt, ftgl and glut, as well as changing -Wl,-shared to -shared in the config file. Now it loads, but when I make any gem objects pd (and sometimes linux) locks up. I kind of gave up for a while: it gets tiring not having any successes for a long strech like that. i should try again, though I dont know where to start... Any Ideas? thanks, -thewade

2 1

netsend/receive, a bit more
by Adrian deCleir 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

as in physical sockets? this is probably the problem alright, coz Ive kind of gathered that once one person is connected to someone know one else seems to be connecting to them -----Original Message----- From: cyrille henry [mailto:cyrille.henry@la-kitchen.fr] Sent: 25 March 2004 16:12 To: Adrian deCleir Cc: nexyufuli evo; 'PD-list(a)iem.at' Subject: Re: [PD] netsend/receive, a bit more how many socket are you using? I think you need 2 for each computer (they can be the same for each computer), because the 2 other computers will not be able to connect to the same socket. sometimes it helps to connect the 3 computer in broadcast mode (connect to 255.255.255.255 to allow sending data to all computer connected in the lan. hope this helps, cyrille nexyufuli evo wrote: > . .. .maybe you try netclient / netserver of the maxlib it works > bydirectional, you can broatcast ore send msg to a specific computer . . > . .. > grz nos > > > Adrian deCleir wrote: > >> i dont know if anyone can help here but cheers if you can(im sure your >> getting bored of netsend.receive questions) >> This is a bit confusing so I hope you can have to patience to read it >> >> Anyway I basically have 3 computers on a LAN, I want them all to be >> connected to each other, so >> 1: computer A(we'll call it) I connect to computer B and C perfectly, I >> use a different port number each different computer, this works fine, >> 2: I try and then connect computer B to A and C, it connects to A fine >> but >> when I connect to C it says its connected but nothing happens in C when i >> try and affect it, so it doesnt seem to connect properly >> >> 3: Anyway I move on despite this and try connect C to B and A, same again >> except it doesnt affect either B or A, so basically it says its connected >> but when I go to change values of B and A using C absolutely nothing >> changes >> in B and A >> >> is there limitations to netsend netreceive ?? as in the first one >> connects >> with the other 2 perfect, but the next one only connects to A and the >> next >> one doesnt connect properly to any of them >> Ive done this in different orders too, like starting with C, it connects >> perfect to B and A, but then B only connects to C and A doesnt connect at >> all, >> The most annoying part is the fact that its telling me its connected fine >> Any help appreciated if you can >> thanks adrian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-list mailing list >> PD-list(a)iem.at >> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list mailing list > PD-list(a)iem.at > http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list >

1 0

RE: [PD] netsend/receive, a bit more
by Adrian deCleir 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

I tried that, its still dodgy though and WAAYYY to slow anyway thanks anyway -----Original Message----- From: nexyufuli evo [mailto:noskule@gmx.net] Sent: 25 March 2004 15:55 To: Adrian deCleir Cc: 'PD-list(a)iem.at' Subject: Re: [PD] netsend/receive, a bit more . .. .maybe you try netclient / netserver of the maxlib it works bydirectional, you can broatcast ore send msg to a specific computer . . . .. grz nos Adrian deCleir wrote: >i dont know if anyone can help here but cheers if you can(im sure your >getting bored of netsend.receive questions) >This is a bit confusing so I hope you can have to patience to read it > >Anyway I basically have 3 computers on a LAN, I want them all to be >connected to each other, so > > 1: computer A(we'll call it) I connect to computer B and C perfectly, I >use a different port number each different computer, > this works fine, > >2: I try and then connect computer B to A and C, it connects to A fine but >when I connect to C it says its connected but nothing happens in C when i >try and affect it, so it doesnt seem to connect properly > >3: Anyway I move on despite this and try connect C to B and A, same again >except it doesnt affect either B or A, so basically it says its connected >but when I go to change values of B and A using C absolutely nothing changes >in B and A > >is there limitations to netsend netreceive ?? as in the first one connects >with the other 2 perfect, but the next one only connects to A and the next >one doesnt connect properly to any of them >Ive done this in different orders too, like starting with C, it connects >perfect to B and A, but then B only connects to C and A doesnt connect at >all, > >The most annoying part is the fact that its telling me its connected fine >Any help appreciated if you can >thanks >adrian > >_______________________________________________ >PD-list mailing list >PD-list(a)iem.at >http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list > > > >

1 0

netsend/receive, a bit more
by Adrian deCleir 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

i dont know if anyone can help here but cheers if you can(im sure your getting bored of netsend.receive questions) This is a bit confusing so I hope you can have to patience to read it Anyway I basically have 3 computers on a LAN, I want them all to be connected to each other, so 1: computer A(we'll call it) I connect to computer B and C perfectly, I use a different port number each different computer, this works fine, 2: I try and then connect computer B to A and C, it connects to A fine but when I connect to C it says its connected but nothing happens in C when i try and affect it, so it doesnt seem to connect properly 3: Anyway I move on despite this and try connect C to B and A, same again except it doesnt affect either B or A, so basically it says its connected but when I go to change values of B and A using C absolutely nothing changes in B and A is there limitations to netsend netreceive ?? as in the first one connects with the other 2 perfect, but the next one only connects to A and the next one doesnt connect properly to any of them Ive done this in different orders too, like starting with C, it connects perfect to B and A, but then B only connects to C and A doesnt connect at all, The most annoying part is the fact that its telling me its connected fine Any help appreciated if you can thanks adrian

3 2

Brealing down FFT info
by thewade 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

Hello sweetist of lists, I have a question about fft~ and what it outputs: I want to be able to analize the data that comes out of rfft~ as individual bins in order from 0 to n-1 where n = samples divided by 2. I assume that this is what rfft~ emits every cycle, so if I were to make an object dsp_analize_tilde, this object would get in its signal port a pointer to an array of information? Is there a simple peice of code that I could use either as a template, or as something to reverse engineer? I am intermediate with C++, but the C code I\'ve seen (Ive written a simple external based on info from the iem.at tutorial) isint always entirely clear. Any help would be appreciated, thanks! -thewade

2 1

Re: [PD] [GEM] Iterating geos trick
by zmoelnig＠iem.at 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

Zitiere Johannes Taelman <j0(a)advalvas.be>: > I've found a trick to use one gemhead and one gem-geo-object to render > > multiple instances of the same geo. This could be very usefull to create > pretty, but there are simpler ways. (and faster it seems on my machine; and more stable) for this kind of things, i use [repeat] (zexy) which repeats anything that appears on the left inlet a number of times (changeable with the second inlet; btw: [repeat] *need*s an argument (initial repetition-cound)), e.g.: gemlists. this makes the "lister"-constuct you used obsolete, and reduced the number of dependencies (zexy/iemlib -> zexy) similar functionality is hidden in the [part_render] and [part_info] objects. and no, i don't think i will include a [gemlist]-container object (that does exactly what [repeat] does) mfg.cas.dr IOhannes

1 0

[OT] Help Building a Linux Laptop
by thewade 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

Hello list, I have a few questions to ask: Im building and pricing my dream machine.(yay!) Does linux/Gem hardware acceleration work best with an ATI or Nvida cards? Has anyone heard of using a pcmcia firewire expansion card (adds more firewire ports) to use multiple streams of video on one machine in Gem/PDP? I ask this question because some machines only have one pcmcia slot, and I have a hammerfall cardbus that needs that slot. If I cant do the firewire idea (and the 64bit AMD\'s should be able to handle the load) then I hont hold out for the two slots... Is there anyone out there that has used either an AMD 64bit laptop or desktop in conjunction with linux (and pd), that would have any comments about it, good or bad? Sorry for the OT post, but I figure that you all are the real source of this information, thoes who use. And sence the hardware is frequently just as important as the software... -thewade

2 1

Fingerworks and Neo-Bechstein and Sensor Laboratory
by Sukandar Kartadinata 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

Hi, for everyone interested in Fingerworks' keyboards (www.fingerworks.com) - I just got a first version of a little OS X app running that redirects the keyboard's output to pd thru [netreceive] (and should thus also work with Max). It's based on FW's first SDK which is still hand-motion based, i.e. not providing independent coordinates for every finger. More to come hopefully... I'll use it on Friday (Mar26) at a Neo-Bechstein concert in Berlin if anyone's curious to see it in action: www.sukandar.de/musik/nb.html I'll probably wrap it up next week and post it - stay tuned. Berlin folks who can't make it to the concert can also check it out later and visit me at Podewil where I'm in the process of setting up a Sensor Laboratory. Sukandar ________________________________________________________ Sukandar Kartadinata artist-in-residence im Podewil www.glui.de [atelier 412] www.sukandar.de/musik Sensor Labor +49-30-44051219 +49-30-24749-707

1 0

Re: [PD] getting netsend and netreceive to work
by mark sargeant 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

2 1

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
39
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list March 2004