7 Mar
2019
7 Mar
'19
2:55 a.m.
On 7/3/19 5:17 am, enrike wrote:> there are some issues I need to check yet
One thing that would make SyncJams more reliable is if I removed the elaborate state-sync feature. Alas I succumbed to the typical programmer scope-creep and tried to throw the whole kitchen sink into the protocol. What I should have done, and what I hope to work on in future, is to keep a very tight focus on clock sync. This would reduce the amount of traffic on the network to a single UDP packet per tick.
Cheers,
Chris.
--
https://mccormick.cx/
Sign up to my newsletter to hear about tech I'm building.
https://mccormick.cx/subscribe