-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-12-01 19:06, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
In other words, the clocks are in sinc. So if one stops, the other waits.
is that it???
yes, that is the purpose and strength of [pd~].
miller did a paper/presentation on that topic at the 3rd Pd~convention in Sao Paolo; in case you have missed it there'you can download the paper at [1]
If so... no way around to change this with [pd~], right?
no, not if yuo don't want to defeat the purpose of [pd~].
But would it be possible to review this and maybe allow it for future versions?
no, not if yuo don't want to defeat the purpose of [pd~].
So then, how is it possible to have a separate process, in a separate core, with an independent clock?
by using a mechanism that is not synchronous.
- Use separate computers? - Just open another actual Pd and send messages
to it via net objects?
yes; the latter seems to be the most feasible in this context.
fgmasdr IOhannes
[1] http://puredata.info/community/projects/convention09/puckette.pdf