Hi Kyle
i attached my vadsr version. additional to A D S R it has a "hold" parameter. just omit it if you think it doesn't make sense. at this point vadsr~ doesn't supply any arguments, unlike adsr~. if anybody want to make a proper abstraction, feel free... :-)
cheerio
On Jul 23, 2006, at 7:06 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
This is right on topic with something I've been trying to tinker with to no avail yet. I'm trying to implement the recent posts for the vad~ abstraction that fbar and others have been shooting around, and turning it into a vadsr~ abstraction by using the template from the adsr~ example patch.
The problem lies with the different algorithms for attack and decay, and getting a nice transition between them. I'm too tired to explain it or dig up the patch right now, but it would be cool to have an eadsr~ abstraction, and it seems within reach.
Any takers?
~Kyle