From: András Murányi muranyia@gmail.com To: Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork 20121019 stable candidate now available
Well, my humble suggestion is to extend the bullet to read "Precompiled for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise (may also work on other distributions)."
Change to: probably _won't_ work on Debian and Debian-derived distributions.
It's a problem with 2.14 having been so buggy that Debian Wheezy decided to skip over it and go straight to 2.15 (along with many other distros, according to what I've read about the issue), but they had a freeze before upgrading to 2.15. Many distros are stuck on 2.13 for the time being, including Debian Squeeze.
-Jonathan
I assume adding a check to "make install" is the more complicated way.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
I can see the potential problems. I have however pointed out in the site in the next bullet immediately below the download links "Precompiled for Ubuntu (may also work on other distributions)." I guess I really need to move to the deb model of distribution...
On Nov 9, 2012 12:13 PM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ico, I completely understood what you meant by compiling from source. I just wanted to point out that there is no notice with the download link nor a check during "make install" so the "best option for newcomers" binary can eventually screw up someone's installation, and that someone may or may not have the time/skills/heart to compile the thing from source. It's not 100% safe.
Me, I'll compile it as soon as I have some time.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Well, those are binaries you tried installing. The script included in the full package simply copies files, it does not do any dependency checks. What you need to do is to compile from source...
On Nov 9, 2012 11:57 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
(Ouch) OK :)
I don't know what's possible during a "make install" but ideally it would check for the presence of the right glibc in order not to install something that won't work.
András
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
These were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04. If your distribution uses older version of glibc, you will have to compile your own from the dev package. Simply follow instructions on the software page. It is pretty much automated process provided you have installed all the dependencies (also listed on the page).
If anyone is interested in helping me package debs please contact me. Thanks! On Nov 9, 2012 10:28 AM, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote: > >Apologies for x-posting... >> >>It is my pleasure to announce latest version a.k.a. stable candidate of >>pd-l2ork. Having chased down a couple of lingering and extremely sporadic >>bugs, I am pleased to report that this latest version is our first "beta" >>release with the primary focus on ensuring 100% stable experience. The >>latest version also includes updates to the K12 module which now includes >>over 40 unique abstractions. As usual, for additional info as well as both >>32-bit and 64-bit Linux builds please visit >>http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56 >> >> >I've installed Pd-l2ork-full-x86_64-20121108.tar.bz2 on Ubuntu Lucid and when I start pd-l2ork I get the following error: >pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: version
GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by pd-l2ork) >pd-l2ork: /lib/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found (required by pd-l2ork) > >András >
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list