16 Jul
2012
16 Jul
'12
9:37 a.m.
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 01:29 -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
If per-sample control is what you crave, you can either mess with sig_vs message to pd (or whatever it is, can't remember it off top my head) and deal with the cpu overhead, design your control entirely in signal land, or go with something like chuck programming language (which also has a considerably higher cpu footprint for the same reasons).
Pd does indeed provide an infrastructure for sub-sample accurate control message timing. You don't have to adjust the block size to 1 (which would still be only sample accurate, besides being utterly expensive).
Roman